Technology assessment in practice and theory

Authors

  • Erik Fisher School for the Future of Innovation in Society, Arizona State University (US)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.28.2.s73

References

Barben, Daniel; Fisher, Erik; Selin, Cynthia; Guston, David (2008): Anticipatory governance of nanotechnology. Foresight, engagement, and integration. In: Edward Hackett and Olga Amsterdamska (eds.): The handbook of science and technology studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 979–1000.

Fisher, Erik; Mahajan, Roop (2006): Midstream modulation of nanotechnology research in an academic laboratory. In: Engineering technology management. Engineering business management, safety engineering and risk analysis, technology and society. n. p.: ASME, pp. 189–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2006-14790

Guston, David (2014): Understanding ‘anticipatory governance’. In: Social Studies of Science 44 (2), pp. 218–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713508669

Schuurbiers, Daan (2011): What happens in the lab. Applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory. In: Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4), pp. 769–788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9317-8

Stilgoe, Jack; Owen, Richard; Macnaghten, Phil (2013): Developing a framework for responsible innovation. In: Research Policy 42 (9), pp. 1568–1580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008

Stirling, Andy (2006): Precaution, foresight and sustainability. Reflection and reflexivity in the governance of science and technology. In: Jan-Peter Voss, Dierk Bauknecht and René Kemp (eds.): Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Cheltenham: Elgar, pp. 225–272.

Downloads

Published

08.07.2019

How to Cite

1.
Fisher E. Technology assessment in practice and theory. TATuP [Internet]. 2019 Jul. 8 [cited 2023 Jan. 26];28(2):73-4. Available from: https://www.tatup.de/index.php/tatup/article/view/229