Impact chains of energy sufficiency policies: A proposal for visualization and possibilities for integration into energy modeling
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.31.2.40Keywords:
energy sufficiency, sufficiency policy, impact chains, impact assessment, energy modelingAbstract
Impact chains are used in many different fields of research to depict the various impacts of an activity and to visualize the system in which this activity is embedded. Research has not yet conceptualized impact chains specifically for energy sufficiency policies. We develop such a concept based on current evaluation approaches and extend these by adding qualitative elements such as success factors and barriers. Furthermore, we offer two case studies in which we test this concept with the responsible climate action managers. We also describe options for integrating these impact chains into different types of energy models, which are key tools in policy consulting.
References
Aall, Carlo et al. (2020): Methods for climate change risk assessments. An international knowledge review. Project UNCHAIN: Work Package 1, Deliverable D1.1. Available online at https://www.vestforsk.no/sites/default/files/2021-01/D1.1-knowledge%20review%20final2%20%281%29.pdf, last accessed on 09. 05. 2022.
Akenji, Lewis; Lettenmeier, Michael; Koide, Ryu; Toivio, Viivi; Amellina, Aryanie (2019): 1.5‑degree lifestyles. Targets and options for reducing lifestyle carbon footprints. Hayama: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies. Available online at https://www.iges.or.jp/en/publication_documents/pub/technicalreport/en/6719/15_Degree_Lifestyles_MainReport.pdf, last accessed on 09. 05. 2022.
Best, Benjamin et al. (2022): Building a database for energy sufficiency policies. [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. In: F1000Research 11, p. 229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.108822.2
Cludius, Johanna; Schumacher, Katja; Kreye, Konstantin (2022): Energiepreiskrise. Wie sozialverträglich ist das Entlastungspaket der Bundesregierung? In: Blog – Beiträge und Standpunkte aus dem Ökosinstitut. Available online at https://blog.oeko.de/energiepreiskrise-wie-sozialvertraeglich-ist-das-entlastungspaket-der-bundesregierung/, last accessed on 09. 05. 2022.
Creutzig, Felix et al. (2021): Reviewing the scope and thematic focus of 100000 publications on energy consumption, services and social aspects of climate change. A big data approach to demand-side mitigation. In: Environmental Research Letters 16 (3), p. 033001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd78b
Creutzig, Felix et al. (2022): Demand-side solutions to climate change mitigation consistent with high levels of wellbeing. In: Nature Climate Change 12, pp. 36–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01219-y
Darby, Sarah; Fawcett, Tina (2018): Energy sufficiency. An introduction. Concept Paper. Oxford, UK: Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford. Available online at https://www.energysufficiency.org/static/media/uploads/site-8/library/papers/sufficiency-introduction-final-oct2018.pdf, last accessed on 09. 05. 2022.
DeGEval – Gesellschaft für Evaluation (2016): Standards für Evaluation. Erste Revision. Mainz: Gesellschaft für Evaluation e. V. Available online at https://www.degeval.org/fileadmin/Publikationen/DeGEval-Standards_fuer_Evaluation.pdf, last accessed on 09. 05. 2022.
Faber, Jasper et al. (2012): Behavioural climate change mitigation options and their appropriate inclusion in quantitative longer term policy scenarios. Main Report. Delft: European Commission, DG Climate Action. Available online at https://ec.europa.eu/clima/system/files/2016-11/main_report_en.pdf, last accessed on 09. 05. 2022.
Fischer, Corinna et al. (2016): Konzept zur absoluten Verminderung des Energiebedarfs. Potenziale, Rahmenbedingungen und Instrumente zur Erreichung der Energieverbrauchsziele des Energiekonzepts. Dessau-Roßlau: Umweltbundesamt. Available online at https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/378/publikationen/climate_change_17_2016_konzept_zur_absoluten_verminderung_des_energiebedarfs.pdf?msclkid=e4aae565cf8111ecb1288850c9c0980c, last accessed on 09. 05. 2022.
Fischer, Corinna et al. (2020): Möglichkeiten der Instrumentierung von Energieverbrauchsreduktion durch Verhaltensänderung. Dessau-Roßlau: Umweltbundesamt. Available online at https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/1410/publikationen/2020-05-06_texte_56-2020_energieverbrauchsreduktion.pdf, last accessed on 09. 05. 2022.
Fuchs, Doris et al. (2021): Consumption corridors. Living a good life within sustainable limits. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367748746
Gross, Neil (2018): The structure of causal chains. In: Sociological Theory 36 (4), pp. 343–367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275118811377
IMWG – Impact Measurement Working Group (2014): Measuring impact. Subject paper of the impact measurement working group. s.l.: Social Impact Investment Taskforce. Available online at https://gsgii.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Measuring-Impact-WG-paper-FINAL.pdf, last accessed on 09. 05. 2022.
IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2022): Climate change 2022 – mitigation of climate change. Summary for policymakers. s.l.: s.n. Available online at https://report.ipcc.ch/ar6wg3/pdf/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_SummaryForPolicymakers.pdf, last accessed on 09. 05. 2022.
O’Neill, Daniel; Fanning, Andrew; Lamb, William; Steinberger, Julia (2018): A good life for all within planetary boundaries. In: Nature Sustainability 1 (2), pp. 88–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4
OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2009): Evaluation policy and guidelines for evaluations. The Hague: Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Available online at https://www.oecd.org/dac/evaluation/iob-evaluation-policy-and-guidelines-for-evaluations.pdf, last accessed on 10. 05. 2022.
PIK – Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (2014): The Climate Impacts. Global and regional adaptation support platform. ci:grasp 2.0 – impact chains. Available online at http://www.pik-potsdam.de/cigrasp-2/ic/ic.html, last accessed on 04. 05. 2022.
Ringkjøb, Hans-Kristian; Haugan, Peter; Solbrekke, Ida (2018): A review of modelling tools for energy and electricity systems with large shares of variable renewables. In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 96, pp. 440–459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.002
Samadi, Sascha et al. (2017): Sufficiency in energy scenario studies. Taking the potential benefits of lifestyle changes into account. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change 124, pp. 126–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.013
Sandberg, Maria (2021): Sufficiency transitions. A review of consumption changes for environmental sustainability. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 29, p. 126097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126097
Schlomann, Barbara et al. (2020): Methodikleitfaden für Evaluationen von Energieeffizienzmaßnahmen des BMWi. Karlsruhe: s.n. Available online at https://www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/M-O/methodik-leitfaden-fuer-evaluationen-von-energieeffizienzmassnamen.pdf?__blob=publicationFile, last accessed on 09. 05. 2022.
Schneidewind, Uwe; Zahrnt, Angelika (2013): Damit gutes Leben einfacher wird. Perspektiven einer Suffizienzpolitik. München: oekom. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14512/9783865816481
Stengel, Oliver (2011): Weniger ist schwer. Barrieren in der Umsetzung suffizienter Lebensstile – und wie wir sie überwinden können. In: GAIA 20 (1), pp. 26–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.20.1.7
Toulouse, Edouard; Le Dû, Mathieu; Gorge, Hélène; Semal, Luc (2017): Stimulating energy sufficiency. Barriers and opportunities. In: Proceedings of the European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy summer study, pp. 59–70. Available online at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328025367_Stimulating_energy_sufficiency_barriers_and _opportunities, last accessed on 09. 05. 2022.
UNFCCC – United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2000): Review of the implementation of commitments and of other provisions of the Convention. UNFCCC guidelines on reporting and review. Available online at https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/docs/cop5/07.pdf, last accessed on 10. 05. 2022.
Vita, Gibran et al. (2019): The environmental impact of green consumption and sufficiency lifestyles scenarios in Europe. Connecting Local sustainability visions to global consequences. In: Ecological Economics 164, p. 106322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.002
Wiese, Frauke; Thema, Johannes; Cordroch, Luisa (2022): Strategies for climate neutrality. Lessons from a meta-analysis of German energy scenarios. In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition 2, p. 100015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rset.2021.100015
Winkler, Christian; Mocanu, Tudor (2020): Impact of political measures on passenger and freight transport demand in Germany. In: Transportation Research Part D. Transport and Environment 87, p. 102476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102476
Wolff, Franziska; Kampffmeyer, Nele; Schumacher, Katja (2019): Handreichung für Evaluationen in der Umweltpolitik. Freiburg: Öko-Institut. Available online at www.oeko.de/fileadmin/oekodoc/WP-Evaluation-Umweltpolitik.pdf, last accessed on 09. 05. 2022.
Zell-Ziegler, Carina; Förster, Hannah (2018): Mit Suffizienz mehr Klimaschutz modellieren. Dessau-Roßlau: Umweltbundesamt. Available online at https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/1410/publikationen/uba_texte_55_2018_zwischenbericht_mit_suffizienz_mehr_klimaschutz_modellieren.pdf?msclkid=d7432416cf9711ec9de52e46a89ff41, last accessed on 09. 05. 2022.
Zell-Ziegler, Carina et al. (2021): Enough? The role of sufficiency in European energy and climate plans. In: Energy Policy 157, p. 112483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112483
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Carina Zell-Ziegler, Johannes Thema
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.