Assessing the journey of technology hype in the field of quantum technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.32.3.17Keywords:
hype, iterative expectations, quantum technologyAbstract
The ‘second quantum revolution’ promises new technologies enabled by quantum physics and has been the subject of substantial hype. We show that while creating expectations has helped secure support for quantum research, their iterative effects can come to affect the field in concrete ways. These iterative impacts for quantum include emerging discussions about ethics and the delivery of promised outcomes. Such contestations could open up alternative quantum futures, but this will depend on how the ‘hype helix’ of iterative expectations unfolds.
References
Birch, Kean; Levidow, Les; Papaioannou, Theo (2012): Self-fulfilling prophecies of the European knowledge-based bio-economy. The discursive shaping of institutional and policy frameworks in the bio-pharmaceuticals sector. In: Journal of the Knowledge Economy 5 (1), pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0117-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0117-4
Borup, Mads; Brown, Nik; Konrad, Kornelia; Van Lente, Harrow (2006): The sociology of expectations in science and technology. In: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3–4), pp. 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777002
Chen, Sophia (2019): Revolt! Scientists say they’re sick of quantum computing’s hype. In: Wired, 12. 12. 2019. Available online at https://www.wired.com/story/revolt-scientists-say-theyre-sick-of-quantum-computings-hype/, last accessed on 31. 10. 2023.
Das Sarma, Sankar (2022): Quantum computing has a hype problem. In: MIT Technology Review, 28. 03. 2022. Available online at https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/03/28/1048355/quantum-computing-has-a-hype-problem/, last accessed on 31. 10. 2023.
Davis, Jenny; Jurgenson, Nathan (2014): Context collapse. Theorizing context collusions and collisions. In: Information, Communication & Society 17 (4), pp. 476–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.888458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.888458
Eames, Malcolm; McDowall, William; Hodson, Mike; Marvin, Simon (2006): Negotiating contested visions and place-specific expectations of the hydrogen economy. In: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3–4), pp. 361–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777127
Ettenhuber, Katrin (2008): Hyperbole. Exceeding similitude. In: Sylvia Adamson, Gavin Alexander and Katrin Ettenhuber (eds.): Renaissance figures of speech. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511988806.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511988806.025
Felt, Ulrike (2014): Within, across and beyond. Reconsidering the role of social sciences and humanities in Europe. In: Science as Culture 23 (3), pp. 384–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2014.926146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2014.926146
Gardner, John; Samuel, Gabrielle; Williams, Clare (2015): Sociology of low expectations. Recalibration as innovation work in biomedicine. In: Science, Technology, & Human Values 40 (6), pp. 998–1021. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915585579 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915585579
Gibney, Elizabeth (2019): Quantum gold rush. The private funding pouring into quantum start-ups. In: Nature 574 (7776), pp. 22–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02935-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02935-4
Inglesant, Philip; Ten Holter, Carolyn; Jirotka, Marina; Williams, Robin (2021): Asleep at the wheel? Responsible innovation in quantum computing. In: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 33 (11), pp. 1364–1376. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1988557 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1988557
Konrad, Kornelia; Alvial Palavicino, Carla (2017): Evolving patterns of governance of, and by, expectations. The GrapheneHype wave. In: Diana Bowman, Elen Stokes and Arie Rip (eds.): Embedding new technologies into society. A regulatory, ethical, and societal perspective. Singapore: Jenny Stanford, pp. 187–217. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315379593-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315379593-9
Marwick, Alice; Boyd, Danah (2011): I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately. Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. In: New Media & Society 13 (1), pp. 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313
McCray, Patrick (2013): The Visioneers. How a group of elite scientists pursued space colonies, nanotechnologies, and a limitless future. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400844685 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400844685
n.a. (2015): Gartner hype cycle. Available online at https://www.gartner.com/en/research/methodologies/gartner-hype-cycle, last accessed on 31. 10. 23.
Petersen, Alan; Munsie, Megan; Tanner, Claire; MacGregor, Casimir; Brophy, Jane (2017): Stem cell tourisms and the political economy of hope. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47043-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47043-0
Ploeger, Joanna (2009): The boundaries of the new frontier. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
Pritchard, Jonathan; Till, Stephen (2014): UK quantum technology landscape report. Available online at https://www.quantumcommshub.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/QuantumTechnologyLandscape.pdf, last accessed on 31. 10. 2023.
Roberson, Tara (2020): Can hype be a force for good? Inviting unexpected engagement with science and technology futures. In: Public understanding of science 29 (5), pp. 544–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520923109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520923109
Roberson, Tara (2021): On the social shaping of quantum technologies. An analysis of emerging expectations through grant proposals from 2002–2020. In: Minerva 59 (3), pp. 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-021-09438-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-021-09438-5
Roberson, Tara; Leach, Joan; Raman, Sujatha (2021): Talking about public good for the second quantum revolution. Analyzing quantum technology narratives in the context of national strategies. In: Quantum Science and Technology 6 (2), p. 025001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/abc5ab DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/abc5ab
Schyfter, Pablo; Calvert, Jane (2015): Intentions, expectations and institutions. Engineering the future of synthetic biology in the USA and the UK. In: Science as Culture 24 (4), pp. 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2015.1037827 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2015.1037827
Tutton, Richard (2011): Promising pessimism. Reading the futures to be avoided in biotech. In: Social Studies of Science 41 (3), pp. 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710397398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710397398
WEF – World Economic Forum (2021): Quantum computing governance. Available online at https://www.weforum.org/projects/quantum-computing-ethics, last accessed on 31. 10. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003440239-8
Williams, Oscar (2021): “This risks creating an arms race”. Inside Europe’s battle over the future of quantum computing. In: The New Statesman, 14. 04. 2021. Available online at https://www.newstatesman.com/business/2021/04/risks-creating-arms-race-inside-europes-battle-over-future-quantum-computing, last accessed on 31. 10. 2023.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Tara Roberson, Sujatha Raman, Joan Leach, Samantha Vilkins

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.