Don’t believe the hype?: Imagined business futures and overpromising for a decarbonized economy

Thomas Frisch

doi:10.14512/tatup.32.3.54

Authors

Thomas Frisch Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Hamburg, Hamburg (DE) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2840-5168 thomas.frisch@uni-hamburg.de

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.32.3.54

Keywords:

decarbonization, imagined futures, overpromising, companies, sociology of expectations

Abstract

International climate governance is increasingly focusing on the role of the private sector. This article explores how companies translate the narrative of deep decarbonization into their entrepreneurial visions of the future. Based on a qualitative multiple case study, it shows that overpromising is an essential feature of imagined business futures, and identifies three forms of overpromising: contradiction, exaggeration, and commitment. The research article contributes to the emerging field of hype and overpromising by proposing a contextual and nuanced understanding of overpromising. The results illustrate the power of desirable transformation narratives, but also their limitations and side effects.

References

Alvial-Palavicino, Carla; Konrad, Kornelia (2019): The rise of graphene expectations. Anticipatory practices in emergent nanotechnologies. In: Futures 109, pp. 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.10.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.10.008

Aykut, Stefan; Morena, Edouard; Foyer, Jean (2021): ‘Incantatory’ governance. Global climate politics’ performative turn and its wider significance for global politics. In: International Politics 58 (4), pp. 519–540. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-020-00250-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-020-00250-8

Bakker, Sjoerd; Budde, Björn (2012): Technological hype and disappointment. Lessons from the hydrogen and fuel cell case. In: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24 (6), pp. 549–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.693662 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.693662

Beck, Silke; Jasanoff, Sheila; Stirling, Andy; Polzin, Christine (2021): The governance of sociotechnical transformations to sustainability. In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 49, pp. 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.04.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.04.010

Beckert, Jens (2016): Imagined futures. Fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674545878 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674545878

Beckert, Jens (2021): The firm as an engine of imagination. Organizational prospection and the making of economic futures. In: Organization Theory 2 (2), p. 26317877211005. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211005773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211005773

Boettcher, Miranda; Brent, Kerryn; Buck, Holly; Low, Sean; McLaren, Duncan; Mengis, Nadine (2021): Navigating potential hype and opportunity in governing marine carbon removal. In: Frontiers in Climate 3, p. 664456. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.664456 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.664456

Borup, Mads; Brown, Nik; Konrad, Kornelia; Van Lente, Harro (2006): The sociology of expectations in science and technology. In: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3–4), pp. 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777002

Engels, Anita; Marotzke, Jochem; Gresse, Eduardo; López-Rivera, Andrés; Pagnone, Anna; Wilkens, Jan (eds.) (2023): Hamburg climate futures outlook. The plausibility of a 1.5 °C limit to global warming – social drivers and physical processes. Hamburg: Universität Hamburg. http://doi.org/10.25592/uhhfdm.11230

Engels, Anita; Kunkis, Michael; Altstaedt, Sören (2020): A new energy world in the making. Imaginary business futures in a dramatically changing world of decarbonized energy production. In: Energy Research & Social Science 60, p. 101321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101321

Fankhauser, Sam et al. (2022): The meaning of net zero and how to get it right. In: Nature Climate Change 12 (1), pp. 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01245-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01245-w

Geels, Frank; Sovacool, Benjamin; Schwanen, Tim; Sorrell, Steve (2017): Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization. In: Science 357 (6357), pp. 1242–1244. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao3760 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao3760

Intemann, Kristen (2022): Understanding the problem of “hype”. Exaggeration, values, and trust in science. In: Canadian Journal of Philosophy 52 (3), pp. 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2020.45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2020.45

Kester, Johannes; Sovacool, Benjamin; Noel, Lance; Zarazua de Rubens, Gerardo (2020): Between hope, hype, and hell. Electric mobility and the interplay of fear and desire in sustainability transitions. In: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 35, pp. 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.02.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.02.004

Lamb, William et al. (2020): Discourses of climate delay. In: Global Sustainability 3, p. e17. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.13

Meyer, John; Rowan, Brian (1977): Institutionalized organizations. Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In: American Journal of Sociology 83 (2), pp. 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/226550

Millar, Neil; Batalo, Bojan; Budgell, Brian (2022): Trends in the use of promotional language (hype) in abstracts of successful national institutes of health grant applications, 1985–2020. In: JAMA network open 5 (8), p. e2228676. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28676 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28676

Mische, Ann (2014): Measuring futures in action. Projective grammars in the Rio+20 debates. In: Theory and Society 43 (3–4), pp. 437–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-014-9226-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-014-9226-3

Net Zero Tracker (2023): Companies. Available online at https://zerotracker.net/#companies-table, last accessed on 30. 10. 2023.

Powell, Walter; DiMaggio, Paul (eds.) (1991): The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226185941.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226185941.001.0001

Sovacool, Benjamin; Bazilian, Morgan; Kim, Jinsoo; Griffiths, Steven (2023): Six bold steps towards net-zero industry. In: Energy Research & Social Science 99, p. 103067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103067

Strübing, Jörg (2021): Grounded theory. Zur sozialtheoretischen und epistemologischen Fundierung eines pragmatistischen Forschungsstils. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24425-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24425-5

Suchman, Mark (1995): Managing legitimacy. Strategic and institutional approaches. In: The Academy of Management Review 20 (3), pp. 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331

Tilsted, Joachim; Palm, Ellen; Bjørn, Anders; Lund, Jens (2023): Corporate climate futures in the making. Why we need research on the politics of science-based targets. In: Energy Research & Social Science 103, p. 103229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103229

Van Lente, Harro; Spitters, Charlotte; Peine, Alexander (2013): Comparing technological hype cycles. Towards a theory. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80 (8), pp. 1615–1628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.12.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.12.004

Velte, Patrick (2023): Determinants and consequences of corporate social responsibility decoupling – status quo and limitations of recent empirical quantitative research. In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, pp. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2538 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2538

Vogel, Jefim; Hickel, Jason (2023): Is green growth happening? An empirical analysis of achieved versus Paris-compliant CO2-GDP decoupling in high-income countries. In: The Lancet. Planetary Health 7 (9), pp. e759–e769. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00174-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00174-2