Efforts against stem cell hype stuck in the logic of overpromising?: An essay on hype-conducive ways of doing ethics

Anja Pichl

doi:10.14512/tatup.32.3.66

Authors

Anja Pichl Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, University of Potsdam, Potsdam (DE) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9386-8690 anja.pichl@uni-potsdam.de

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.32.3.66

Keywords:

hype, stem cell research, organoids, bioethics, vision assessment

Abstract

Studies on hype have had a strong focus on the role of science, media and markets in overstating potential benefits or risks of emerging science and technologies. Less attention has been paid to the role of ethics in creating or sustaining hype or alarmism. This research article focuses on how bioethical approaches as well as bioethicists’ relationship towards science contribute to stem cell and organoid hype. How (if at all) may ways of doing ethics fuel exaggerated expectations and could ethics be done differently? Understanding hype-conducive ways of how ethicists engage with science and technology is of relevance not only for the broader ethical community but also for technology assessment and science and technology studies where an increasing interest in normative dimensions of their object of study has been observed.

References

Bredenoord, Annelien; Clevers Hans; Knoblich, Juergen (2017): Human tissues in a dish. The research and ethical implications of organoid technology. In: Science 355 (6322), p. eaaf9414. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf9414 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf9414

Brown, Nik; Michael, Mike (2003): A sociology of expectations. Retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects. In: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 15 (1), pp. 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953732032000046024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0953732032000046024

Burns, Lawrence (2009): “You are our only hope”. Trading metaphorical “magic bullets” for stem cell “superheroes”. In: Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (6), pp. 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-009-9126-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-009-9126-0

Caulfield, Timothy; Condit, Celeste (2012): Science and the sources of hype. In: Public Health Genomics 15 (3–4), pp. 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1159/000336533 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000336533

Caulfield, Timothy (2016): Ethics hype? In: Hastings Center Report 46 (5), pp. 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.612

Caulfield, Timothy; Sipp, Douglas; Murry, Charles; Daley, George; Kimmelman, Jonathan (2016): Scientific community. Confronting stem cell hype. In: Science 352 (6287), pp. 776–777. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf4620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf4620

Daley, George (2012): The promise and perils of stem cell therapeutics. In: Cell Stem Cell 10 (6), pp. 740–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2012.05.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2012.05.010

Dusseldorp, Marc (2014): Technikfolgenabschätzung zwischen Neutralität und Bewertung. In: Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 64 (6–7), pp. 25–30.

Franklin, Ursula (2004): Stem Cells R Us. Emergent life forms and the global biological. In: Aihwa Ong and Stephen Collier (eds.): Global assemblages. Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 59–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696569.ch4

Hauskeller, Christine; Pichl, Anja; Manzeschke, Arne (2019): Knowledge and normativity. A matrix of disciplines and practices. In: Christine Hauskeller, Arne Manzeschke and Anja Pichl (eds.): The matrix of stem cell research. An approach to rethinking science in society. London: Routledge, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315104386-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315104386-1

Hedgecoe, Adam (2004): Critical bioethics. Beyond the social science critique of applied ethics. In: Bioethics 18 (2), pp. 120–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00385.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00385.x

Hedgecoe, Adam (2010): Bioethics and the reinforcement of socio-technical expectations. In: Social Studies of Science 40 (2), pp. 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709349781 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709349781

Hilgartner, Steven; Prainsack, Barbara; Hurlbut, Benjamin (2017): Ethics as governance in genomics and beyond. In: Ulrike Felt, Rayvon Fouché, Clark Miller and Laurel Smith-Doerr (eds.): The handbook of science and technology studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 823–852.

Hyun, Insoo (2017): Engineering ethics and self-organizing models of human development. Opportunities and challenges. In: Cell Stem Cell 21 (6), pp. 718–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2017.09.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2017.09.002

Intemann, Kristen (2022): Understanding the problem of “hype”. Exaggeration, values, and trust in science. In: Canadian Journal of Philosophy 52 (3), pp. 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2020.45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2020.45

ISSCR – International Society for Stem Cell Research (2021): Guidelines for stem cell science and clinical translation. Available online at https://www.isscr.org/guidelines, last accessed on 26. 10. 2023.

Kamenova, Kalina; Caulfield, Timothy (2015): Stem cell hype. Media portrayal of therapy translation. In: Science Translational Medicine 7 (278), p. 278ps4. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3010496 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3010496

Kollek, Regine (2019): Implicit values in technology assessment. A plea for reflexive normativity. In: TATuP – Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice 28 (1), pp. 15–20. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.28.1.15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.28.1.15

Konrad, Kornelia; Van Lente, Harro; Groves, Christopher; Selin, Cynthia (2017): Performing and governing the future in science and technology. In: Ulrike Felt, Rayvon Fouché, Clark Miller and Laurel Smith-Doerr (eds.): The handbook of science and technology studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 465–493.

Lettow, Susanne (2011): Biophilosophien. Wissenschaft, Technologie und Geschlecht im philosophischen Diskurs der Gegenwart. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.

Lösch, Andreas; Roßmann, Maximilian; Schneider, Christoph (2021): Vision Assessment als sozio-epistemische Praxis. In: Stefan Böschen, Armin Grundwald, Bettina-Johanna Krings and Christinie Rösch (eds.): Technikfolgenabschätzung. Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Praxis. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 337–351. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748901990-337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748901990-337

Lysaght, Tamra; Campbell, Alastair (2013): Broadening the scope of debate around stem cell research. In: Bioethics 27 (5), pp. 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01963.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01963.x

Martin, Paul; Brown, Nik; Kraft, Alison (2008): From bedside to bench? Communities of promise, translational research and the making of blood stem cells. In: Science as Culture 17 (1), pp. 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505430701872921 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09505430701872921

Mason, Chris; Manzotti, Elisa (2009): Induced pluripotent stem cells. An emerging technology platform and the Gartner hype cycle. In: Regenerative Medicine 4 (3), pp. 329–331. https://doi.org/10.2217/rme.09.20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2217/rme.09.20

McNeil, Maureen; Arribas-Ayllon, Michael; Haran, Joan; Mackenzie, Adrian; Tutton, Richard (2017): Conceptualizing imaginaries of science, technology, and society. In: Ulrike Felt, Rayvon Fouché, Clark Miller and Laurel Smith-Doerr (eds.): The handbook of science and technology studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 435–462.

Munsie, Megan; Hyun, Insoo; Sugarman, Jeremy (2017): Ethical issues in human organoid and gastruloid research. In: Development 144 (6), pp. 942–945. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.140111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.140111

Nerlich, Brigitte (2013): Moderation impossible? On hype, honesty and trust in the context of modern academic life. In: The Sociological Review 61 (2_suppl), pp. 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12099

Nierling, Linda; Hennen, Leonhard; Torgersen, Helge (2021): Normativität in der TA. In: Stefan Böschen, Armin Grunwald, Bettina-Johanna Krings and Christine Rösch (eds.): Technikfolgenabschätzung. Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Praxis. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 240–252. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748901990-240 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748901990-240

Nordmann, Alfred (2007): If and then. A critique of speculative nanoethics. In: NanoEthics, 1 (1), pp. 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-007-0007-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-007-0007-6

Petersen, Alan; Munsie, Megan; Tanner, Claire; MacGregor, Casimir; Brophy, Jane. (2017): Stem cell tourism and the political economy of hope. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47043-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47043-0

Rajan, Kaushik (2006): Biocapital. The constitution of postgenomic life. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv120qqqr DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv120qqqr

Turner, Leigh (2021): The American stem cell sell in 2021. US businesses selling unlicensed and unproven stem cell interventions. In: Cell Stem Cell 28 (11), pp. 1891–1895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2021.10.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2021.10.008

Vinsel, Lee (2021). You’re doing it wrong. Notes on criticism and technology hype. In: Medium, 01. 01. 2021. Available online at https://sts-news.medium.com/youre-doing-it-wrong-notes-on-criticism-and-technology-hype-18b08b4307e5, last accessed on 23. 10. 2023.

Vogt, Henrik; Gaillard, Maxence; Green, Sara (2022): Hybrida D 2.3. Adaptation of health technology assessment (HTA) to evaluate organoids and organ-on-a-chip as emerging technologies in the clinic. Available online at https://hybrida-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/D2.3-Adaptation-of-health-technology-assessment-HTA-to-evaluate-organoids-and-organ-on-a-chip-as-emerging-technologies-in-the-clinic.pdf, last accessed on 23. 10. 2023.