New and emerging perspectives for technology assessment: Malevolent creativity and civil security




malevolent creativity, extremism, radicalization, technology assessment, civil security


The characteristics of new technologies can cause significant harm to society. This does not only apply to unintended consequences, but even more so when the technologies are used for malicious purposes. The latter can be observed in the domain of civil security. Here, negative developments such as social polarization, increasing radicalization, and democratic regression alongside a deteriorating security situation are increasingly associated with technological innovation and malevolent creativity. As society becomes more and more aware of such correlations, technology assessment is called upon to provide orientation knowledge. This requires appropriate approaches and knowledge tools to assess the potential role of technology in relation to radicalization and political extremism.


Baram, Michael (1973): Technology assessment and social control. In: Science 180 (4085), pp. 465–473. DOI:

Bogner, Alexander (2021): Politisierung, Demokratisierung, Pragmatisierung. Paradigmen der Technikfolgenabschätzung im Wandel der Zeit. In: Stefan Böschen, Armin Grunwald, Bettina-Johanna Krings and Christine Rösch (eds.): Technikfolgenabschätzung. Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Praxis. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 43–58. DOI:

Bröckling, Ulrich (2015): Der präventive Imperativ und die Ökonomisierung des Sozialen. In: Public Health Forum 21 (4), pp. 29–31. DOI:

Büscher, Christian et al. (2022): Trends der zukünftigen Technologienutzung im Kontext von Extremismus und Terrorismus. Erste Erkenntnisse aus dem MOTRA-Technologiemonitoring. In: Uwe Kemmesies et al. (eds.): MOTRA-Monitor 2021. Wiesbaden: BKA, pp. 248–281.

Calvert, Julius (2024): Engagement with radical propaganda drives cognitive radicalization. An analysis of a right-wing online ecosystem. In: Journal of Strategic Security 17 (1), pp. 24–30. DOI:

Chertoff, Michael (2017): A public policy perspective of the Dark Web. In: Journal of Cyber Policy 2 (1), pp. 26–38. DOI:

Collingridge, David (1980): The social control of technology. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

Cronin, Audrey (2020): Power to the people. How open technological innovation is arming tomorrow’s terrorists. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Cropley, David; Kaufman, James; Cropley, Arthur (2008): Malevolent creativity. A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. In: Creativity Research Journal 20 (2), pp. 105–115. DOI:

de Haan, Hans; Rotmans, Jan (2011): Patterns in transitions. Understanding complex chains of change. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78 (1), pp. 90–102. DOI:

Dessecker, Axel; Fecher, Lena; Hirth, Maria-Anna; Hofmann, Rebecca; Muzaqi, Lavdim (2024): Medien- und Technologienutzung durch jihadistische Straftäter*innen. Wiesbaden: MOTRA-Verbund.

Dolnik, Adam (2007): Understanding terrorist innovation. Technology, tactics and global trends. London: Routledge.

Gates, Scott; Podder, Sukanya (2015): Social media, recruitment, allegiance and the Islamic State. In: Perspectives on Terrorism 9 (4), pp. 107–116. Available online at, last accessed on 02. 05. 2024.

Genus, Audley; Coles, Anne-Marie (2005): On constructive technology assessment and limitations on public participation in technology assessment. In: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 17 (4), pp. 433–443. DOI:

Gibson, James (2015): The ecological approach to visual perception. New York, NY: Psychology Press. DOI:

Gill, Paul; Horgan, John; Hunter, Samuel; Cushenbery, Lily (2013): Malevolent creativity in terrorist organizations. In: The Journal of Creative Behavior 47 (2), pp. 125–151. DOI:

Guston, David; Sarewitz, Daniel (2002): Real-time technology assessment. In: Technology in Society 24 (1–2), pp. 93–109. DOI:

Jackson, Brian (2001): Technology acquisition by terrorist groups. Threat assessment informed by lessons from private sector technology adoption. In: Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 24 (3), pp. 183–213. DOI:

Kusche, Isabel; Büscher, Christian (2021): Technologiemonitoring zur Prävention von Extremismus und terroristischer Gewalt. In: Birgit Blättel-Mink (ed.): Gesellschaft unter Spannung. Verhandlungen des 40. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie 2020. Available online at, last accessed on 02. 05. 2024.

Luhmann, Niklas (2005): Risk. A sociological theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transactions.

Madeira, Octavia; Plattner, Georg; Gazos, Alexandros; Röller, Tim; Büscher, Christian (2023): Technologiemonitoring. Das Potenzial von Metaverse und KI für extremistische Verwendungszwecke. In: Uwe Kemmesies et al. (eds.): Motra-Monitor 2022. Wiesbaden: BKA, pp. 226–252. Available online at, last accessed on 02. 05. 2024.

Mahfoud, Tara; Aicardi, Christine; Datta, Saheli; Rose, Nikolas (2018): The limits of dual use. In: Issues in Science and Technology 34 (4), pp. 73–78. Available online at, last accessed on 02. 05. 2024.

McLaren, Robert (1993): The dark side of creativity. In: Creativity Research Journal 6 (1–2), pp. 137–144. DOI:

Mølmen, Guri; Ravndal, Jacob (2023): Mechanisms of online radicalisation. How the internet affects the radicalisation of extreme-right lone actor terrorists. In: Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression 15 (4), pp. 463–487. DOI:

Moore, Daniel; Rid, Thomas (2016): Cryptopolitik and the darknet. In: Survival 58 (1), pp. 7–38. DOI:

MOTRA (2024): Radicalization Monitoring System and Transfer Platform. Available online at, last accessed on 02. 05. 2024.

Nieweglowska, Maja; Stellato, Cal; Sloman, Steven (2023): Deepfakes. Vehicles for radicalization, not persuasion. In: Current Directions in Psychological Science 32 (3), pp. 236–241. DOI:

Papada, Evie et al. (2023): Defiance in the face of autocratization. Democracy report 2023. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg. DOI:

Sadowski, Jathan (2015): Office of technology assessment. History, implementation, and participatory critique. In: Technology in Society 42, pp. 9–20. DOI:

Schmid, Alex (2013): The definition of terrorism. In: Alex Schmid (ed.): The Routledge handbook of terrorism research. London: Routledge, pp. 39–157.

Schmid, Alex (2020): Terrorism prevention. Conceptual issues (definitions, typologies and theories). In: Alex Schmid (ed.): Handbook of terrorism prevention and preparedness. The Hague: ICCT Press, pp. 13–48. Available online at, last accessed on 02. 05. 2024.

Schot, Johan; Rip, Arie (1997): The past and future of constructive technology assessment. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54 (2–3), pp. 251–268. DOI:

Stilgoe, Jack; Owen, Richard; Macnaghten, Phil (2013): Developing a framework for responsible innovation. In: Research Policy 42 (9), pp. 1568–1580. DOI:

Stirling, Andy (2010): Keep it complex. In: Nature 468 (7327), pp. 1029–1031. DOI:

Ware, Jacob (2023): The third generation of online radicalization. Washington, DC: George Washington University.




How to Cite

Gazos A, Madeira O, Plattner G, Röller T, Büscher C. New and emerging perspectives for technology assessment: Malevolent creativity and civil security. TATuP [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 28 [cited 2024 Jul. 25];33(2):9-15. Available from:

Funding data

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>