Competing or complementary?: Socio-technical imaginaries of a bio-based construction sector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.7145Keywords:
socio-technical imaginaries, sustainability transitions, bio-based materials, visions, construction sectorAbstract
The construction sector needs to transition toward using bio-based building materials in order to reduce its negative environmental impact. However, it is unclear how exactly such a bio-based future will look like, with different stakeholders in different geographical contexts having different visions of the sector’s future. Based on an extensive collection of expert interviews with stakeholders from the construction industry in China, India, Italy, and Germany, we have identified six primary visions. These are characterized by variations in their socio-technical logics, including preferred materials, targeted market segments, economic characteristics, and stage of development. While many visions appear to be complementary in principle, our findings also reveal conflicts, which are often socially constructed. These conflicts may impede the transition toward a bio-based construction sector, as certain visions may delegitimize alternative uses of bio-based materials.
References
Beck, Silke; Jasanoff, Sheila; Stirling, Andy; Polzin, Christine (2021): The governance of sociotechnical transformations to sustainability. In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 49, pp. 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.04.010
Berkhout, Frans (2006): Normative expectations in systems innovation. In: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3-4), pp. 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777010
Borup, Mads; Brown, Nik; Konrad, Kornelia; van Lente, Harro (2006): The sociology of expectations in science and technology. In: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3-4), pp. 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777002
Braun, Kathrin; Kropp, Cordula (2023): Building a better world? Competing promises, visions, and imaginaries-in-the-making of the digitalization of architecture and construction. In: Futures 154, p. 103262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2023.103262
Cherry, Catherine; Hopfe, Christina; MacGillivray, Brian; Pidgeon, Nick (2017): Homes as machines. Exploring expert and public imaginaries of low carbon housing futures in the United Kingdom. In: Energy Research & Social Science 23, pp. 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.10.011
Churkina, Galina et al. (2020): Buildings as a global carbon sink. In: Nature Sustainability 3 (4), pp. 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0462-4
Dewald, Ulrich; Achternbosch, Matthias (2016): Why more sustainable cements failed so far? Disruptive innovations and their barriers in a basic industry. In: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 19, pp. 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.10.001
Geels, Frank (2004): From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems. Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. In: Research Policy 33 (6-7), pp. 897–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
Hajer, Maarten (ed.) (2010): The politics of environmental discourse. Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Clarendon.
Haque, Anika; Lemanski, Charlotte; Groot, Jiska de (2021): Why do low-income urban dwellers reject energy technologies? Exploring the socio-cultural acceptance of solar adoption in Mumbai and Cape Town. In: Energy Research & Social Science 74, p. 101954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.101954
Jasanoff, Sheila; Kim, Sang-Hyun (2009): Containing the atom. Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. In: Minerva 47 (2), pp. 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4
Jasanoff, Sheila; Kim, Sang-Hyun (2013): Sociotechnical imaginaries and national energy policies. In: Science as Culture 22 (2), pp. 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2013.786990
Jayaweera, Ravi; Rohracher, Harald; Becker, Annalena; Waibel, Michael (2023): Houses of cards and concrete. (In)stability configurations and seeds of destabilisation of Phnom Penh’s building regime. In: Geoforum 141, p. 103744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103744
Markard, Jochen; Raven, Rob; Truffer, Bernhard (2012): Sustainability transitions. An emerging field of research and its prospects. In: Research Policy 41 (6), pp. 955–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
Martin, Robert (2021): AV futures or futures with AVs? Bridging sociotechnical imaginaries and a multi-level perspective of autonomous vehicle visualisations in praxis. In: Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8 (1), pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00739-4
Mast, Hanna (2022): Conflicting sociotechnical imaginaries of the future built environment. An analysis of current discourses on timber construction in France and Germany. In: GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 31 (3), pp. 151–157. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.31.3.5
Muehlberger, Clara-Marie; Gruen, Lennart; Liefner, Ingo; Losacker, Sebastian (2024): Socio-technical imaginaries of climate-neutral aviation. In: Energy Research & Social Science 114, p. 103595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103595
Rudek, Tadeusz (2022): Capturing the invisible. Sociotechnical imaginaries of energy. The critical overview. In: Science and Public Policy 49 (2), pp. 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab076
Trencher, Gregory; van der Heijden, Jeroen (2019): Contradictory but also complementary. National and local imaginaries in Japan and Fukushima around transitions to hydrogen and renewables. In: Energy Research & Social Science 49, pp. 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.019
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lennart Fischer, Sebastian Losacker
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
