Effective and democratic long-term radioactive waste governance: Lessons from Europe

Romy Dekker; Rinie van Est

doi:10.14512/tatup.7202

Authors

Romy Dekker Rathenau Instituut, The Hague (NL) r.dekker@rathenau.nl
Rinie van Est Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven (NL) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3990-3042 q.vanest@rathenau.nl

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.7202

Keywords:

long-term governance, radioactive waste, decision-making, participation, knowledge, financing

Abstract

Radioactive waste management (RWM) presents a complex long-term governance challenge due to its decades-to-centuries-long timeframes and associated uncertainties. In response to societal resistance to top-down governance approaches, most European countries have adopted new strategies to make RWM governance more democratic and effective. This article explores how four interlinked key areas of long-term governance – decision-making, public participation, knowledge, and financing – are shaped by various European countries through interconnected procedures, principles, and institutions. It identifies nine lessons for democratic and effective long-term RWM governance, concluding that a stepwise, participatory approach is a promising strategy to deal with the uncertainties and democratic deficits inherent in long-term issues. However, realizing this potential requires a continuous search for adequate procedures, principles, and institutions.

References

Arentsen, Maarten; van Est, Rinie (eds.) (2023): The future of radioactive waste governance. Lessons from Europe. Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40496-3

Brunnengräber, Achim (2019): The wicked problem of long term radioactive waste governance. Ten characteristics of a complex technical and societal challenge. In: Achim Brunnengräber and Maria Di Nucci (eds.): Conflicts, participation and acceptability in nuclear waste governance. An international comparison. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27107-7_17

Dekker, Romy; Lagendijk, Vincent; Schuijer, Marleen; van Est, Rinie (2024): Taking steps together now. Advisory report on the decision-making process on the long-term management of radioactive waste. Den Haag: Rathenau Instituut. Available online at https://www.rathenau.nl/sites/default/files/2024-10/Rapport_Nu_samen_stappen_maken_Rathenau_Instituut_en_10-10.pdf, last accessed on 11.04.2025.

Dekker, Romy; Lagendijk, Vincent; Walstock, Roos; van Est, Rinie (2023): Long-term radioactive waste management in the Netherlands. Seeking guidance for decision-making. In: Maarten Arentsen and Rinie van Est (eds.): The future of radioactive waste governance. Lessons from Europe. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40496-3_2

Di Nucci, Maria; Brunnengräber, Achim (2023): The long road towards the soft nuclear repository state. Nuclear waste governance in Germany. In: Maarten Arentsen and Rinie van Est (eds.): The future of radioactive waste governance. Lessons from Europe Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 113–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40496-3_5

Di Nucci, Maria; Prontera, Andrea (2023): Nuclear waste governance in Italy. Between participation rhetoric and regionalism. In: Maarten Arentsen and Rinie van Est (eds.): The future of radioactive waste governance. Lessons from Europe. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 51–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40496-3_3

Espluga-Trenc, Josep; Prades, Ana (2023): The melancholic lock. High-level radioactive waste governance in Spain. In: Maarten Arentsen and Rinie van Est (eds.): The future of radioactive waste governance. Lessons from Europe. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 141–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40496-3_6

EURAD – European Joint Programme on Radioactive Waste Management (2021): Guidance on cost assessment and financing schemes of radioactive waste management programmes. Available online at https://www.ejp-eurad.eu/sites/default/files/2022-02/EURAD%20-%20D12.4%20Guidance%20on%20cost%20assessment%20and%20financing%20schemes%20of%20RWM%20programmes.pdf, last accessed on 08.04.2025.

Ferraro, Gianluca; Martell, Meritxell (2015a): EURATOM projects, radioactive waste management and public participation. What have we learnt so far? A synthesis of principles. Luxembourg: European Union. https://doi.org/10.2790/774407

Ferraro, Gianluca; Martell, Meritxell (2015b): Radioactive waste management and public participation in the EU. Lessons learnt from the EURATOM research framework programmes. In: atw – International Journal for Nuclear Power 60 (12), pp. 709–714.

Hansson, Sven (2023): Nuclear waste as a socio-technical problem. In: TATuP – Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice 32 (2), pp. 50–56. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.32.2.50

IAEA – International Atomic Energy Agency (2023): Roadmap for implementing a geological disposal programme. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.

IAEA (2022): Status and trends in spent fuel and radioactive waste management. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.

IAEA (2020): Costing methods and funding schemes for radioactive waste disposal programmes. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.

IAEA (2012): The safety case and safety assessment for the disposal of radioactive waste. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.

IAEA (2011): Stakeholder involvement throughout the life cycle of nuclear facilities. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.

Koning Boudewijnstichting (2024): Nu voor morgen. Dialoog over de toekomst van radioactief afval. Available online at https://www.nuvoormorgen.be/, last accessed on 11.04.2025.

Koning Boudewijnstichting (n.d.): Wie betaalt wat? Available online at https://www.nuvoormorgen.be/disccusiethemas/wie-betaalt-wat, last accessed on 11.04.2025.

Kuppler, Sophie; Eckhardt, Anne; Hocke, Peter (2023): Who decides what is safe? Experiences from radioactive waste governance in Switzerland. In: Maarten Arentsen and Rinie van Est (eds.): The future of radioactive waste governance. Lessons from Europe. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 169–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40496-3_7

Kuppler, Sophie; Hocke, Peter (2019): The role of long-term planning in nuclear waste governance. In: Journal of Risk Research 22 (11), pp. 1343–1356. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1459791

Lehtonen, Markku (2023): The governance ecosystem of radioactive waste management in France. Governing of and with mistrust. In: Maarten Arentsen and Rinie van Est (eds.): The future of radioactive waste governance. Lessons from Europe. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 231–257.

Lehtonen, Markku (2010): Deliberative decision-making on radioactive waste management in Finland, France and the UK. Influence of mixed forms of deliberation in the macro discursive context. In: Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 7 (3), pp. 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2010.506487

NEA – Nuclear Energy Agency (2004): Stepwise approach to decision making for long-term radioactive waste management. Paris: Nuclear Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

NRC – National Research Council (2003): One step at a time. The staged development of geologic repositories for high-level radioactive waste. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10611

Parotte, Céline (2020): A nuclear real-world experiment. Exploring the experimental mindsets of radioactive waste management organisations in France, Belgium and Canada. In: Energy Research & Social Science 69, p. 101761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101761

Pescatore, Claudio; Vári, Anna (2006): Stepwise approach to the long-term management of radioactive waste. In: Journal of Risk Research 9 (1), pp. 13–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870500180048

Saward, Michael (2021): Democratic design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schröder, Jantine; Bergmans, Anne; Laes, Erik (2015): Advanced research, lagging policy. In: Achim Brunnengräber, Maria Di Nucci, Ana Losada, Lutz Mez and Miranda Schreurs (eds.): Nuclear waste governance. An international comparison. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08962-7_6

Schwarz, Lucas (2022): Intergenerational justice starts now. Recognizing future generations in nuclear waste management. In: TATuP – Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice 31 (3), pp. 37–43. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.31.3.37

Siebenhüner, Bernd; Arnold, Marlen; Eisenack, Klaus; Jacob, Klaus (2013): Long-term governance for social-ecological change. London: Routledge.

Swahn, Johan (2023): Radioactive waste management in Sweden. Decision-making in a context of scientific controversy. In: Maarten Arentsen and Rinie van Est (eds.): The future of radioactive waste governance. Lessons from Europe. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 259–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40496-3_10

Thomas, Stephen (2023): UK nuclear waste policy. 50 wasted years. In: Maarten Arentsen and Rinie van Est (eds.): The future of radioactive waste governance. Lessons from Europe. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40496-3_8

van Est, Rinie; Arentsen, Maarten (2023): European lessons for the governance of long-term radioactive waste management. In: Maarten Arentsen and Rinie van Est (eds.): The future of radioactive waste governance. Lessons from Europe. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 319–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40496-3_12

Vehmas, Jarmo; Rentto, Aleksis; Luukkanen, Jyrki; Auffermann, Burkhard; Kaivo-oja, Jari (2023): The Finnish solution to final disposal of spent nuclear fuel. In: Maarten Arentsen and Rinie van Est (eds.): The future of radioactive waste governance. Lessons from Europe. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 287–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40496-3_11