Prognostic uncertainty and accountability, moral uncertainty and ‘value lock-in’: Three epistemological challenges for long-term governance and their ethical implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.7204Keywords:
longtermism, moral uncertainty, accountability, valuesAbstract
This article discusses long-term governance from an epistemological and ethical perspective. It focuses on three epistemological challenges for long-term governance and their profound ethical implications. The first challenge lies at the intersection of prognostic uncertainty about the distant future and the assignment of accountability to policymakers in the present. On what basis should policymakers be held accountable for their decisions if the long-term effects are hardly predictable given the knowledge available at the time of decision? The second challenge is moral uncertainty—not uncertainty about facts, but about which ethical theory to follow in decision-making and how to interpret it. Finally, the concept of ‘value lock-in’ and its epistemological challenges in relation to long-term governance are explained. The article concludes that such challenges deserve considerable further research attention because of their implications for effective long-term governance.
References
Barrett, Jacob; Schmidt, Andreas (2024): Moral uncertainty and public justification. In: Philosophers’ Imprint 24 (3), pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3998/phimp.3016
Bostrom, Nick; Cirkovic, Milan (2008): Introduction. In: Nick Bostrom et al. (eds.): Global catastrophic risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198570509.003.0004
Caplan, Bryan (2008): The totalitarian threat. In: Nick Bostrom et al. (eds.): Global catastrophic risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 504–519. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198570509.003.0029
Cirincione, Joseph (2008): The continuing threat of nuclear war. In: Nick Bostrom et al. (eds.): Global catastrophic risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198570509.003.0025
de Vries, Bouke (2024): The dysgenics objection to longtermism. In: Futures 162, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2024.103417
Doran, George (1981): There’s a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management’s goals and objectives. In: Management Review 70 (11), pp. 35–36.
Dougherty, Tom (2014): Vague value. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (2), pp. 352–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12026
Kaler, John (2008): Responsibility, accountability and governance. In: Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 11 (4), pp. 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8608.00292
Lechterman, Theodore (2023): The concept of accountability in AI ethics and governance. In: Justin Bullock et al. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of AI Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.10
MacAskill, William (2023): What we owe the future. A millon-year view. London: Oneworld.
MacAskill, William; Bykvist, Krister; Ord, Toby (2020): Moral uncertainty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198722274.001.0001
MacKenzie, Michael; Setälä, Maija; Kyllönen, Simo (eds.) (2023): Democracy and the future. Future-regarding governance in democratic systems. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781399512749.001.0001
Moreno, Marina (2022): Does longtermism depend on questionable forms of aggregation? In: Intergenerational Justice Review 8 (1), pp. 13–23. https://doi.org/10.24357/igjr.8.1.996
Persson, Ingmar; Savulescu, Julian (2024): On the prospects of longtermism. In: Bioethics 38 (8), pp. 709–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13323.
Scheer, Dirk et al. (2025): No easy way out. Towards a framework concept of long-term governance. In: Energy, Sustainability and Society 15 (1), p. 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-025-00513-3
Siebenhüner, Bernd et al. (2013): Long-term governance for social-ecological change. Setting the scene. In: Bernd Siebenhüber et al. (eds.): Long-term governance for social-ecological change. London: Routledge, pp. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203556160
Yudkowsky, Eliezer (2008): Artificial intelligence as a positive and negative factor in global risk. In: Nick Bostrom et al. (eds.): Global catastrophic risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 308–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198570509.003.0021
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tobias Hainz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

