Value added, value displaced: Addressing sustainability in 6G developments through key value indicators

Fiona McDermott

doi:10.14512/tatup.7229

Authors

Fiona McDermott CONNECT Research Centre for Future Networks and Communications, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin (IE) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9507-3637 fiona.mcdermott@tcd.ie

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.7229

Keywords:

6G, sustainability, key value indicators, value-based design, network technologies

Abstract

In the anticipated transition to 6G technologies, their impact on sustainability will be of central importance. To assess these impacts, an innovative approach based on key value indicators (KVIs) is proposed that takes into account the multiple dimensions of sustainability. This includes the direct impact of the technology (e.g., via its ecological footprint) as well as its indirect impacts on societal, environmental, and economic sustainability in various sectors. This article critically reflects on the formation and application of KVIs as a metric by which to assess sustainability in 6G developments. It suggests the addition of technology assessment as a practical means to understand and assess the equity implications of 6G design, working alongside stakeholders and building on existing critical technology studies to create value-based socio-technical ecosystems.

References

Adelmeyer, Michael; Walterbusch, Marc; Biermanski, Peter; Seifert, Kai; Teuteberg, Frank (2017): Rebound effects in cloud computing. Towards a conceptual framework. In: Jan Leinenmeister and Walter Brenner (eds.): Towards thought leadership in digital transformation. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik. St. Gallen: Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 499–513. Available online at https://www.wi2017.ch/images/tagungsband_wi_2017.pdf, last accessed on 17.10.2025.

Ali, Christopher (2021): Farm fresh broadband. The politics of rural connectivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12822.001.0001

Appel, Hannah; Anand, Nikhil; Gupta, Akhil (2018): Introduction. Temporality, politics, and the promise of infrastructure. In: Nikhil Anand, Akhil Gupta and Hannah Appel (eds.): The promise of infrastructure. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478002031-001

Birhane, Abeba; Kalluri, Pratyusha; Card, Dallas; Agnew, William; Dotan, Ravit; Bao, Michelle (2022): The values encoded in machine learning research. In: FAccT ’22. Proceedings of the 2022 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533083

Flaherty, Eoin; Sturm, Tristan; Farries, Elizabeth (2022): The conspiracy of Covid-19 and 5G. Spatial analysis fallacies in the age of data democratization. In: Social Science & Medicine 293, p. 114546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114546

Gabrys, Jennifer (2020): Planetary health in practice. Sensing air pollution and transforming urban environments. In: Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 7 (1), p. 35. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00534-7

Green, Ben (2019): The smart enough city. Putting technology in its place to reclaim our urban future. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gossart, Cédric (2015): Rebound effects and ICT. A review of the literature. In: Lorenz Hilty and Bernard Aebischer (eds.): ICT innovations for sustainability. Cham: Springer, pp. 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09228-7_26

Hoffmann, Marco et al. (2021): Expanded 6G vision, use cases and societal values. Including aspects of sustainability, security and spectrum. Available online at https://hexa-x.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Hexa-X_D1.2.pdf, last accessed on 14.10.2025.

Klein, Lauren; D’Ignazio, Catherine (2024): Data feminism for AI. In: FAccT ’24. Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3658543

Kropp, Cordula; Ley, Astrid; Ottenburger, Sadeeb; Ufer, Ulrich (2021): Making intelligent cities in Europe climate-neutral. About the necessity to integrate technical and socio-cultural innovations. In TATuP – Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice 30 (1), pp. 11–16. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.30.1.11

Latva-aho, Matti; Leppänen, Kari (eds.) (2019): Key drivers and research challenges for 6G ubiquitous wireless intelligence. 6G Research Visions 1. Oulu: University of Oulu.

Luccioni, Alexandra; Pistilli, Giada; Sefala, Raesetje; Moorosi, Nyalleng (2025a): Bridging the gap. Integrating ethics and environmental sustainability in AI research and practice. In: arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.00797

Luccioni, Alexandra; Strubell, Emma; Crawford, Kate (2025b): From efficiency gains to rebound effects. The problem of Jevons’ paradox in AI’s polarized environmental debate. In: arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.16548

Mattern, Shannon (2019): Networked dream worlds. In: Real Life Magazine, 08.07.2019. Available online at https://reallifemag.com/networked-dream-worlds/, last accessed at 14.10.2025.

McDermott, Fiona (2022): 5G. The next true or false public utility of the future city? In: Mediapolis: A Journal of Cities and Culture 7 (3), n. p. Available online at https://www.mediapolisjournal.com/2022/09/5g-public-utility/, last accessed on 15.10.2025.

Monserrate, Steven (2022): The cloud is material. On the environmental impacts of computation and data storage. In: MIT Case Studies in Social and Ethical Responsibilities of Computing. https://doi.org/10.21428/2c646de5.031d4553

Powell, Alison (2021): Undoing optimization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Robson, Garry (2023): Big nihilism. Generation z, surveillance capitalism, and the emerging digital technocracy. In: Information & Culture 58 (2), pp. 180–204. https://doi.org/10.7560/IC58204

Sala, Serenella (2020): Triple bottom line, sustainability and sustainability assessment. An overview. In: Jingzheng Ren, Antonio Scipioni, Alessandro Manzardo and Hanwei Liang (eds.): Biofuels for a more sustainable future. Life cycle sustainability assessment and multi-criteria decision making. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 47–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815581-3.00003-8

Starosielski, Nicole (2015): The undersea networks. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822376224

Tully, John (2009): A victorian ecological disaster. Imperialism, the telegraph, and gutta-percha. In: Journal of World History 20 (4), pp. 559–579. https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.0.0088

UN – United Nations (2015): Transforming our world. The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York, NY: United Nations. Available online at https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf, last accessed on 17.10.2025.

van der Giesen, Coen; Cucurachi, Stefano; Guinée, Jeroen; Kramer, Gert; Tukker, Arnold (2020): A critical view on the current application of LCA for new technologies and recommendations for improved practice. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 259, p. 120904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120904

van de Voort, Tom; Zavrel, Vojtech; Torrens Galdiz, Ignacio; Hensen, Jan (2017): Analysis of performance metrics for data center efficiency. Should the power utilization effectiveness PUE still be used as the main indicator? (Part 1). In: The REHVA European HVAC Journal 54 (1), pp. 5–11. Available online at https://www.rehva.eu/rehva-journal/chapter/analysis-of-performance-metrics-for-data-center-efficiency-should-the-power-utilization-effectiveness-pue-still-be-used-as-the-main-indicator-part-1, last accessed on 17.10.2025.

Wikström, Gustav et al. (2024): Key value indicators. A framework for values-driven next-generation ICT solutions. In: Telecommunications Policy 48 (6), pp. 102778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2024.102778

World Commission on Environment and Development (ed.) (1987): Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.