Technology assessment in the STEM curriculum: Teaching responsible research and innovation skills to future innovators

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.31.1.22

Keywords:

STEM education, interdisciplinarity, discourse skills, innovation ethics, responsible research and innovation

Abstract

This article describes and evaluates a novel approach to incorporating technology assessment (TA), responsible research and innovation as well as science and technology ethics into STEM curricula (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) by the example of the online course ‘Good Chemistry – Methodological, Ethical, and Social Dimensions.’ Based on the evaluation of extensive student feedback, this article answers positively to three major reservations (Is it possible? Is it necessary? Does it make a difference?) that often preclude such contents from STEM curricula: first, understanding the normative dimensions of chemists’ professional agency is a skill, like many others, that requires adequate teaching and training; second, engaging with TA issues not only teaches discourse and critical thinking skills, but increases students’ professional competences to collaborate in highly interdisciplinary settings; third, though this is less evidential and needs to proof in the future, it may enhance chemists’ responsibility as drivers of innovation.

References

Barry, Andrew; Born, Georgina (eds.) (2013): Interdisciplinarity. Reconfigurations of the social and natural sciences. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203584279

Bauer, Anja; Kastenhofer, Karen (2019): Policy advice in technology assessment. Shifting roles, principles and boundaries. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change 139 (C), pp. 32–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.023

Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette; Simon, Jonathan (2012): Chemistry, the impure science. London: Imperial College Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/p832

Bloom, Benjamin (1956): Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.

Develaki, Maria (2008): Social and ethical dimension of the natural sciences, complex problems of the age, interdisciplinarity, and the contribution of education. In: Science & Education 17 (8), pp. 873–888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9077-7

Dusseldorp, Marc; Beecroft, Richard (eds.) (2012): Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren. Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden. Wiesbaden: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93468-6

Ely, Adrian; Van Zwanenberg, Patrick; Stirling, Andrew (2014): Broadening out and opening up technology assessment. Approaches to enhance international development, coordination and democratisation. In: Research Policy 43 (3), pp. 505–518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.09.004

Englehardt, Elaine; Pritchard, Michael (eds.) (2018): Ethics across the curriculum. Pedagogical perspectives. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78939-2

European Commission (2013): Options for strengthening responsible research and innovation. Brussels: European Commission. Available online at https://op.europa.eu/o/opportal-service/download-handler?identifier=1e6ada76-a9f7-48f0-aa86-4fb9b16dd10c&format=pdf&language=en&productionSystem=cellar&part=, last accessed on 26. 01. 2022.

European Commission (2016): Open innovation, open science, open to the world. A vision for Europe. Brussels: European Commission. Available online at http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3213b335-1cbc-11e6-ba9a-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_2, last accessed on 26. 01. 2022.

Felt, Ulrike; Fouché, Rayvon; Miller, Clark; Smith-Doerr, Laurel (eds.) (2017): Handbook of science and technology studies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Gianni, Robert; Pearson, John; Reber, Bernard (eds.) (2019): Responsible research and innovation. From concepts to practices. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315457291

Grunwald, Armin (2019): Technology assessment in practice and theory. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429442643

Hansson, Sven Ove (ed.) (2017): The ethics of technology. Methods and approaches. London: Rowman & Littlefield Intl.

Heras, Maria; Ruiz-Mallén, Isabel (2017): Responsible research and innovation indicators for science education assessment. How to measure the impact? In: International Journal of Science Education 39 (18), pp. 2482–2507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1392643

Iphofen, Ron (ed.) (2020): Handbook of research ethics and scientific integrity. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7

Kagan, Jerome (2009): The three cultures. Natural sciences, social sciences, and the humanities in the 21st century. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576638

Koops, Bert-Jaap; Oosterlaken, Ilse; Romijn, Henny; Swierstra, Tsjalling; van den Hoven, Jeroen (eds.) (2015): Responsible innovation 2. Concepts, approaches, and applications. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17308-5

Mehlich, Jan (2017): Is, ought, should. The role of scientists in the discourse on ethical and social implications of science and technology. In: Palgrave Communications 3, p. 17006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.6

Mehlich, Jan (2021): Good chemistry. Methodological, ethical, and social dimensions. London: Royal Chemical Society.

Mejlgaard, Niels et al. (2018): Teaching responsible research and innovation. A phronetic perspective. In: Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (2), pp. 597–615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0029-1

Mumford, Michael (2017): Assessing the effectiveness of responsible conduct of research training. Key findings and viable procedures. In: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (ed.): Fostering integrity in research. Washington: The National Academies Press.

Parker, Lisa; Sankar, Pamela; Boyer, Joy; McEwen, Jean; Kaufman, David (2019): Normative and conceptual ELSI research. What it is, and why it’s important. In: Genetics in Medicine 21, pp. 505–509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0065-x

Pruzan, Peter (2016): Research methodology. The aims, practices and ethics of science. Cham: Springer.

Simonis, Georg (ed.) (2013): Konzepte und Verfahren der Technikfolgenabschätzung. Wiesbaden: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02035-4

Zeidler, Dana (ed.) (2003): The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4996-X

Downloads

Published

08.04.2022

How to Cite

1.
Mehlich J. Technology assessment in the STEM curriculum: Teaching responsible research and innovation skills to future innovators. TATuP [Internet]. 2022 Apr. 8 [cited 2024 Mar. 28];31(1):22-7. Available from: https://www.tatup.de/index.php/tatup/article/view/6954