No time to waste: Exploring timeprints of radioactive waste management options in Belgium

Sacha Frenay; Céline Parotte

doi:10.14512/tatup.31.3.24

Authors

Sacha Frenay Spiral Research Center, University of Liège, Liège (BE) sacha.frenay@student.uliege.be
Céline Parotte Spiral Research Center, University of Liège, Liège (BE) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8205-4760 celine.parotte@uliege.be

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.31.3.24

Keywords:

timeprints, politics of time, tacit governance, radioactive waste management options, Belgium

Abstract

Following the work of Barbara Adam (1998) and Ulrike Felt (2016), we draw particular attention to ‘timeprints’ in the assessment and selection of radioactive waste management (RWM) options. Using the example of Belgium, we identify four different timeprints mobilized (un)consciously by stakeholders when assessing RWM options, namely trajectorism, promise economy, radioactive waste identity, and multi-situated timeprints. We show that each of these timeprints has a significant impact on the RWM option to be considered and actively determines future radioactive waste management pathways in the form of ‘tacit governance’.

References

Adam, Barbara (2010): History of the future. Paradoxes and challenges. In: Rethinking History Routledge, 14 (3), pp. 361–378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2010.482790

Adam, Barbara (1998): Timescapes of modernity. The environment and invisible hazards. London: Routledge.

Adam, Barbara; Groves, Chris (2007): Future matters. Action, knowledge, ethics. Leiden: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004161771.i-218

Appadurai, Arjun (2012): Thinking beyond trajectorism. In: Michael Heinlein, Cordula Kropp, Judith Neumer, Angelika Poferl and Regina Römhild (eds.): Futures of modernity. Challenges for cosmopolitical thought and practice. Bielefeld: Transcript, pp. 25–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/transcript.9783839420768.25

Arthur, Brian (1994): Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.10029

Beckert, Jens (2016): Imagined futures. Fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics. Harvard: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674545878

Council of Ministers (2022). Mesure politique nationale pour la gestion à longterme des déchets hautement radioactifs et/ou à vie longue. In: news.belgium, 01. 04. 2022. Available online at https://news.belgium.be/fr/mesurepolitique-nationale-pour-la-gestion-long-terme-des-dechets-hautementradioactifs-etou-vie, last accessed on 09. 11. 2022.

Espeland, Wendy; Sauder, Michael (2007): Rankings and reactivity. How public measures recreate social worlds. In: American Journal of Sociology 113 (1),pp. 1–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/517897

European Commission (2007): Taking European knowledge society seriously. Report of the expert group on science and governance to the science, economy and society directorate, directorate-general for research, European Commission. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Available online at https://sts.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/i_sts/Ueber_uns/pdfs_Felt/taking_european_knowledge_society_seriously.pdf, last accessed on 31. 10. 2022.

Felt, Ulrike (2016 a): Of timescapes and knowledge scapes. Re-timing research and higher education. In: Peter Scott, Jim Gallacher and Gareth Parry (eds.): New languages and landscapes of higher education. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 129–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198787082.003.0006

Felt, Ulrike (2016 b): The temporal choreographies of participation. Thinking innovation and society from a time-sensitive perspective. In: Jason Chilvers and Matthew Kearnes (eds.): Remaking participation: Science, environment and emergent publics. New York: Routledge, pp. 178–199.

Felt, Ulrike; Fochler, Maximilian (2010): Riskante Verwicklungen des Epistemischen, Strukturellen und Biographischen. Governance-Strukturen und deren mikropolitische Implikationen für das akademische Leben. In: Peter Biegelbauer (ed.): Steuerung von Wissenschaft? Die Governance des österreichischen Innovationssystems. Innsbruck: StudienVerlag, pp. 297–328.

Ialenti, Vincent (2021): Drum breach. Operational temporalities, error politics and WIPP’s kitty litter nuclear waste accident. In: Social Studies of Science 51 (3), pp. 364–391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720986609

Joly, Pierre-Benoît (2015): Le régime des promesses technoscientifiques. In: Marc Audétat (ed.): Sciences et technologies émergentes. Pourquoi tant de promesses? Paris: Hermann, pp. 31–48.

Parotte, Céline; Fallon, Catherine (2020). The future for long-term management of high-level radioactive wastes and spent fuel in Belgium. Executive summary and epilogue. Available online at https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/246178/3/Final_Report_WP3_Parotte_Fallon_2020.pdf, last accessed on 31. 10. 2022.

Saraç-Lesavre, Başak (2020): Deep time financing? ‘Generational’ responsibilities and the problem of rendez-vous in the U.S. nuclear waste programme. In: Journal of Cultural Economy 14 (4), pp. 435–448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2020.1818601