(Re-)connecting academia during a sudden, global crisis

Karen Kastenhofer; Hannah Rosa Friesacher; Alexander Reich; Leo Capari

doi:10.14512/tatup.32.2.17

Authors

Karen Kastenhofer Institute of Technology Assessment, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna (AT) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5843-6489 kkast@oeaw.ac.at
Hannah Rosa Friesacher KU Leuven, Leuven (BE) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0047-0964 rosafriesacher@live.at
Alexander Reich Technical University Vienna, Vienna (AT) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7549-084X reicale@gmx.at
Leo Capari Vienna Doctoral School of Ecology and Evolution, Vienna (AT) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7867-4975 capari@gmx.at

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.32.2.17

Keywords:

COVID-19, expert survey, global crisis, technology assessment in times of crisis, interdisciplinarity

Abstract

Three years ago, the sudden onset of the COVID-19 pandemic challenged academia just like any other societal field, while at the same time putting science center stage. Media attention tended to focus on particular disciplines, such as epidemiology and microbiology, and on individual, mostly local, experts. Based on the idea that science as a global, multidisciplinary community has something to offer society beyond the highly specialized output of individual research fields prepared for local, short-term perspectives, the Institute of Technology Assessment of the Austrian Academy of Sciences launched a spontaneous expert survey in June 2021 with a global and interdisciplinary aspiration, addressing three non-standard issues related to the pandemic and its management: side effects, opportunities, and preparedness. In this paper, we present our methodology and the results of our analysis. We conclude with a discussion of potential contributions of technology assessment in times of sudden, global crises.

References

Anderson, Janna; Rainie, Lee; Vogels, Emily (2021): Experts say the ‘New Normal’ in 2025 will be far more tech-driven, presenting more big challenges. In: Pew Research Center Newsletter, 18. 02. 2021. Available online at https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/02/18/experts-say-the-new-normal-in-2025-will-be-far-more-tech-driven-presenting-more-big-challenges/, last accessed on 05. 05. 2023.

Bauer, Anja; Kastenhofer, Karen (2019): Policy advice in technology assessment. Shifting roles, principles and boundaries. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change 139, pp. 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.023

Corbin, Juliet; Strauss, Anselm (2008): Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

EPTA- European Parliamentary Technology Assessment (2021): Technology assessment and decision making under scientific uncertainty – lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. EPTA Report 2021. The Hague: EPTA. Available online at https://www.tab-beim-bundestag.de/downloads/epta/reports/EPTA%20report%202021.pdf, last accessed on 05. 05. 2023.

Grossmann, Igor; Twardus, Oliver; Varnum, Michael; Jayawickreme, Eranda; McLevey, John (2022): Expert predictions of societal change. Insights from the world after COVID project. In: American Psychologist 77 (2), pp. 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000903

Hagstrom, Warren (1965): The scientific community. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Iftekhar, Emil et al. (2021): A look into the future of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe. An expert consultation. In: The Lancet Regional Health – Europe 8, p. 100185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100185

Jasanoff, Sheila; Hilgartner, Stephen; James, Wilmot; White, Lyal (2021): Learning from COVID-19. A 23-Nation comparative study of COVID-19 response, with lessons for the future of public health. Available online at https://iserp.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/National%20Comparative%20Study%20Synthesis%20Paper.pdf, last accessed on 05. 05. 2023.

Kastenhofer, Karen (2022): Beyond scientificity. Extensions and diffractions in post-normal science’s ethos. In: Serendipities 6 (2), pp. 21–41. https://doi.org/10.7146/serendipities.v6i2.130042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/serendipities.v6i2.130042

Kastenhofer, Karen; Bauer, Anja (2022): “Are you a TA practitioner, then?”. Identity constructions in post-normal science. In: Minerva 61 (1), pp. 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09480-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09480-x

Kastenhofer, Karen; Friesacher, Hannah; Reich, Alexander; Capari, Leo (2021): COVID-19 – voices from academia. Results of an international survey conducted in July 2021. Vienna: ITA. https://doi.org/10.1553/ITA-ms-21-02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1553/ita-ms-21-02

Lazarus, Jeffrey et al. (2022): A multinational Delphi consensus to end the COVID-19 public health threat. In: Nature 611, pp. 332–345. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05398-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05398-2

OECD – Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2021): Main findings from the 2020 risks that matter survey. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Polanyi, Michael (2000): The Republic of Science. Its political and economic theory. In: Minerva 38, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026591624255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026591624255

Pielke Jr., Roger (2007): The honest broker. Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818110

Scott, Stewart (2020): Expert survey series. Societal and geopolitical changes in a post-COVID-19 world. In: Atlantic Council – Geotech Cues, 13. 05. 2020. Available online at https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/geotech-cues/societal-and-geopolitical-changes-in-a-post-covid-19-world/, last accessed on 05. 05. 2023.

Turczynski, Jeanne (2022): Stiko-Chef Mertens. Corona ist mittlerweile endemisch. In: BR24 Newsletter, 31. 10. 2022. Available online at https://www.br.de/nachrichten/deutschland-welt/stiko-chef-corona-ist-mittlerweile-endemisch,TLTQjSW, last accessed on 05. 05. 2023.

UN News (2022): The end of the COVID-19 pandemic is in sight. WHO. Available online at https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/09/1126621, last accessed on 05. 05. 2023.

Weber, Max (1919): Wissenschaft als Beruf. München: Duncker & Humblot.

Weinberger, Nora et al. (2020): Gesellschaftliche Folgen der Corona-Krise – eine Zeitstudie. Zwischenergebnisse – Stand November 2020. Karlsruhe: ITAS/KIT. Available online at https://www.itas.kit.edu/downloads/projekt/projekt_paro20_gesfolcor_erste_ergebnisse_2020-11.pdf, last accessed on 26. 04. 2023.

Wood, Sylvia et al. (2021): Collective foresight and intelligence for sustainability. In: Global Sustainability 4, pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2021.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2021.3

ZDF – Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen (2022): Debatte über Corona-Maßnahmen. Pandemie oder Endemie – wie geht es weiter? In: ZDFheute Politik, 27. 12. 2022. Available online at https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/politik/corona-ende-pandemie-faq-100.html, last accessed on 26. 04. 2023.