Technology hypes: Practices, approaches and assessments




hype, overpromising, expectations, emerging technology


To date, the study of hype has become a productive but also eclectic field of research. This introduction provides an overview of the core characteristics of technology hype and distinguishes it from other future-oriented concepts. Further, the authors present promising approaches from various disciplines for studying, critiquing, and dealing with hype. The special issue assembles case studies, methodological and theoretical contributions that analyze tech hypes’ temporality, agency, and institutional dynamics. It provides insights into how hypes are triggered and fostered, but also how they can be deconstructed and anticipated.


Auch, Adam (2013): Virtuous argumentation and the challenges of hype. In: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation 10: Virtues of Argumentation. Available online at, last accessed on 07. 11. 2023.

Bareis, Jascha; Katzenbach, Christian (2022): Talking AI into being. The narratives and imaginaries of national AI strategies and their performative politics. In: Science, Technology, & Human Values 47 (5), pp. 855–881. DOI:

Beckert, Jens (2016): Imagined futures. Fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI:

Bensaude Vincent, Bernadette (2014): The politics of buzzwords at the interface of technoscience, market and society. The case of ‘public engagement in science’. In: Public Understanding of Science 23 (3), pp. 238–253. DOI:

Birch, Kean (2017): Rethinking value in the bio-economy. Finance, assetization, and the management of value. In: Science, Technology, & Human Values 42 (3), pp. 460–490. DOI:

Bordignon, Frederique; Ermakova, Liana; Noel, Marianne (2021): Over-promotion and caution in abstracts of preprints during the COVID-19 crisis. In: Learned Publishing. Journal of the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers 34 (4), pp. 622–636. DOI:

Chen, Chaomei (2006): CiteSpace II. Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (3), pp. 359–377. DOI:

Chen, Chaomei; Hu, Zhigang; Liu, Shengbo; Tseng, Hung (2012): Emerging trends in regenerative medicine. A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. In: Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy 12 (5), pp. 593–608. DOI:

Dedehayir, Ozgur; Steinert, Martin (2016): The hype cycle model. A review and future directions. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change 108, pp. 28–41. DOI:

Dierkes, Meinolf; Hoffmann, Ute; Marz, Lutz (1996): Visions of technology. Social and institutional factors shaping the development of new technologies. Frankfurt: Campus.

Gillespie, Tarleton (2018): Custodians of the internet. Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. DOI:

Goffman, Erving (1990): The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin.

Goldfarb, Brent; Kirsch, David (2019): Bubbles and crashes. The boom and bust of technological innovation. Stanford: Stanford University Press. DOI:

Gorwa, Robert; Binns, Reuben; Katzenbach, Christian (2020): Algorithmic content moderation. Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. In: Big Data & Society 7 (1), p. 205395171989794. DOI:

Green, Melanie; Brock, Timothy (2000): The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (5), pp. 701–721. DOI:

Grunwald, Armin (2015): Die hermeneutische Erweiterung der Technikfolgenabschätzung. In: TATuP – Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis 24 (2), pp. 65–69. DOI:

Grunwald, Armin (2010): From speculative nanoethics to explorative philosophy of nanotechnology. In: NanoEthics 4 (2), pp. 91–101. DOI:

Intemann, Kristen (2020): Understanding the problem of “hype”. Exaggeration, values, and trust in science. In: Canadian Journal of Philosophy Cambridge University Press 52 (3), DOI:

Jasanoff, Sheila; Kim, Sang-Hyun (2009): Containing the atom. Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. In: Minerva 47 (2), pp. 119–146. DOI:

Kind, Amy (2016): Imagining under constraints. In: Amy Kind and Peter Kung (eds.): Knowledge through imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 145–159. DOI:

Linden, Alexander; Fenn, Jackie (2003): Understanding Gartner’s hype cycles. Strategic analysis report. Available online at, last accessed on 07. 11. 2023.

Löfstedt, Ragnar (2003): Science communication and the swedish acrylamide ‘alarm’. In: Journal of Health Communication 8 (5), pp. 407–432. DOI:

Lösch, Andreas (2006): Anticipating the futures of nanotechnology. Visionary images as means of communication. In: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management Routledge, 18 (3–4), pp. 393–409. DOI:

Millar, Neil; Salager-Meyer, Françoise; Budgell, Brian (2019): “It is important to reinforce the importance of …”. ‘Hype’ in reports of randomized controlled trials. In: English for Specific Purposes 54, pp. 139–151. DOI:

Mische, Ann (2014): Measuring futures in action. Projective grammars in the Rio+20 debates. In: Theory and Society 43 (3–4), pp. 437–464. DOI:

Mosco, Vincent (2005): The digital sublime. Myth, power, and cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI:

Nordmann, Alfred (2007): If and then. A critique of speculative NanoEthics. In: NanoEthics 1 (1), pp. 31–46. DOI:

Rayner, Steve (2012): Uncomfortable knowledge. The social construction of ignorance in science and environmental policy discourses. In: Economy and Society 41 (1), pp. 123–125. DOI:

Rip, Arie (2006): Folk theories of nanotechnologists. In: Science as Culture 15 (4), pp. 349–365. DOI:

Roßmann, Maximilian (2021): Vision as make-believe. How narratives and models represent sociotechnical futures. In: Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (1), pp. 70–93. DOI:

Sand, Martin (2019): On “not having a future.” In: Futures 107, pp. 98–106. DOI:

Schneider, Christoph; Roßmann, Maximilian; Lösch, Andreas; Grunwald, Armin (2023): Transformative vision assessment and 3-D printing futures. A new approach of technology assessment to address grand societal challenges. In: IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 70 (3), pp. 1089–1098. DOI:

Selin, Cynthia (2007): Expectations and the emergence of nanotechnology. In: Science, Technology, & Human Values 32 (2), pp. 196–220. DOI:

Sharma, Abz; Grant, David (2011): Narrative, drama and charismatic leadership: The case of Apple’s Steve Jobs. In: Leadership 7 (1), pp. 3–26. DOI:

Van Lente, Harro; Rip, Arie (1998): Chapter 7. Expectations in technological developments. An example of prospective structures to be filled in by agency. In: Cornelis Disco and Barend Van der Meulen (eds.): Getting new technologies together. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 203–230. DOI:

Vinkers, Christiaan; Tijdink, Joeri; Otte, Willem (2015): Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014. Retrospective analysis. In: British Medical Journal, p. h6467. DOI:

Vinsel, Lee (2021): You’re doing it wrong. Notes on criticism and technology hype. In: Medium, 01. 02. 2021. Available online at, last accessed on 07. 11. 2023.

Woznica, Marcel (2022): Stage performances as means for linking sociotechnical imaginaries and projective genres in the discourse around urban air mobility. In: European Journal of Futures Research 10 (12). DOI:




How to Cite

Bareis J, Roßmann M, Bordignon F. Technology hypes: Practices, approaches and assessments. TATuP [Internet]. 2023 Dec. 13 [cited 2024 Jul. 19];32(3):11-6. Available from:

Funding data

Most read articles by the same author(s)