Dr. Strangelove, or how I learned to stop worrying and love the drone

A review of current debates on drone applications





drones, civil use, military use, technology assessment


Drones are nowadays used in many and very different contexts. From the technology assessment perspective, it therefore seems reasonable to shed more light on the extent of the current and future use of drones and the resulting consequences. In addition, the expected paths of further technological development, relevant actors and their interests as well as potential future applications and fields of use should be analyzed.


Boyle, Michael (2015): The legal and ethical implications of drone warfare. In: The International Journal of Human Rights 19 (2), S. 105–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2014.991210

Broschart, Daniel (2016): Potenziale des Drohneneinsatzes bei der räumlichen Bestandsaufnahme. In: AGIT – Journal für Angewandte Geoinformatik 2, S. 518–527, http://gispoint.de/fileadmin/user_upload/paper_gis_open/AGIT_2016/537622068.pdf, zuletzt geprüft am 28. 10. 2018.

Danilov, A.; Smirnov, U.; Pashkevich, M. (2015): The system of the ecological monitoring of environment which is based on the usage of UAV. In: Russian Journal of Ecology 46 (1), S. 14–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413615010038

Dickow, Marcel; Hansel, Mischa; Mutschler, Max (2015): Präventive Rüstungskontrolle. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen mit Blick auf die Digitalisierung und Automatisierung des Krieges. In: Sicherheit und Frieden (S + F) 33 (2), S. 67–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0175-274x-2015-2-67

Favier, Marc-Alexandre; Green, Richard; Linz, Andreas (2013): The potential for UAV technology to assist in sheep management in the Scottish highlands. In: Bornimer Agrartechnische Berichte 81, S. 209–222.

Großmann, Henning (2017): Rechtliche und versicherungsrechtliche Probleme beim Einsatz von Drohnen. In: Transportrecht 40 (3), 98–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/transpr-2017-0303

Nentwich, Michael; Horváth, Delila (2018): The vision of delivery drones. In: TATuP – Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis 27 (2), S. 46–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.27.2.46

Primicerio, Jacopo et al. (2012): A flexible unmanned aerial vehicle for precision agriculture. In: Precision Agriculture 13 (4), S. 517–523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-012-9257-6

Rao, Bharat; Gopi, Ashwin Goutham; Maione, Romana (2016): The societal impact of commercial drones. In: Technology in Society 45, 83–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.02.009

Rogers, Ann; Hill, John (2014): Unmanned. Drone warfare and global security. London: Pluto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt183p2c5

Sharkey, Noel (2010): Saying „no!“ to lethal autonomous targeting. In: Journal of Military Ethics 9 (4), S. 369–383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2010.537903

Wrycza, Philipp; Rotgeri, Mathias; ten Hompel, Michael (2017): Spielzeitreduktion autonomer Drohnen für den Transport eiliger Güter durch den Einsatz automatisierter Lastaufnahmemittel im Kontext eines ganzheitlich automatisierten Gesamtsystems. In: Logistics Journal: Proceedings, Vol. 2017.



How to Cite

Weber K, Rinke B, Alwardt C. Dr. Strangelove, or how I learned to stop worrying and love the drone: A review of current debates on drone applications. TATuP [Internet]. 2018 Dec. 11 [cited 2022 Oct. 4];27(3):11-3. Available from: https://www.tatup.de/index.php/tatup/article/view/166

Most read articles by the same author(s)