Participatory sensing and wearable technologies as tools to support citizen and open science

Technical and organizational challenges and possible solutions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.26.1-2.25

Keywords:

participatory sensing, wearable technology, citizen science, open science

Abstract

If citizens actively participate in the process of collecting empirical data, as a key element of empirically oriented scientific projects, this can be seen as a contribution to an open and citizen-oriented science. Such participation can be supported by providing technical tools. The paper therefore presents examples of participatory sensing as the provision of affordable sensors for measuring environmental parameters as well as wearable technologies for recording quantified vital data and physiological states. Conceptually, the provision of data collected with these tools can be understood as a commons – with all opportunities and risks associated with such goods. After describing examples of participatory sensing and wearable technologies, the authors identify potential challenges and outline technical and organizational approaches to solve them.

References

Atzori, Luigi; Iera, Antonio; Morabito, Giacomo (2011): SIoT: Giving a Social Structure to the Internet of Things. In: IEEE Communications Letters 15 (11), S. 1193–1195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2011.090911.111340

Austen, Kat (2015): Pollution Patrol. In: Nature 517 (7533), S. 136–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/517136a

Benkler, Yochai; Nissenbaum, Helen (2006): Commons-based Peer Production and Virtue. In: Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (4), S. 394–419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00235.x

Buchanan, James M.; Yoon, Yong J. (2000): Symmetric Tragedies: Commons and Anticommons. In: Journal of Law and Economics 43 (1), S. 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/467445

Devarakonda, Srinivas et al. (2013): Real-time Air Quality Monitoring through Mobile Sensing in Metropolitan Areas. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGKDD international workshop on urban computing. New York: ACM, S. 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2505821.2505834

Faltings, Boi; Radanovic, Goran (2017): Mechanismen zur Beschaffung korrekter Daten. In: Informatik Spektrum 40 (1), S. 64–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-016-1010-5

Fecher, Benedikt; Friesike, Sascha (2014): Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought. In: Bartling, Sönke; Friesike, Sascha (eds.): Opening Science. Cham: Springer, S. 17–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_2

Feldman, Michal; Chuang, John (2005): Overcoming Free-riding Behavior in Peer-to-peer Systems. In: ACM SIGecom Exchanges 5 (4), S. 41–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1120717.1120723

Frey, Bruno S.; Osterloh, Margit (Hg.) (2001): Successful Management by Motivation: Balancing Intrinsic and Extrinsic Incentives. Berlin: Springer.

GEWISS (2016): Grünbuch Citizen Science Strategie 2020 für Deutschland. Berlin: Projekt „Bürger schaffen Wissen – Wissen schafft Bürger“ (GEWISS). Online verfügbar unter https://www.leibniz-gemeinschaft.de/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/Forschung/Citizen_Science/Gruenbuch_Citizen_Science.pdf, zuletzt geprüft am 12. 06. 2017.

Goldman, Jeffrey et al. (2009): Participatory Sensing: A Citizen-powered Approach to Illuminating the Patterns that Shape our World. Foresight and Governance Project White Paper. Center for Embedded Networked Sensing. Online verfügbar unter https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/participatory_sensing.pdf, zuletzt geprüft am 12. 06. 2017.

Hardin, Garrett (1968): The Tragedy of the Commons. In: Science 162 (3859), S. 1243–1248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243

Javed, Nauman; Wolf, Tilman (2012): Automated Sensor Verification using Outlier Detection in the Internet of Things. In: 32nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops. IEEE, S. 291–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCSW.2012.78

Kothmayr, Thomas; Schmitt, Corinna; Hu, Wen; Brünig, Michael; Carle, Georg (2013): DTLS Based Security and Two-way Authentication for the Internet of Things. In: Ad Hoc Networks 11 (8), S. 2710–2723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2013.05.003

Kumar, Prashant et al. (2015): The Rise of Low-cost Sensing for Managing Air Pollution in Cities. In: Environment International 75, S. 199–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.11.019

Lindeman, Neil (2012): Subjectivized Knowledge and Grassroots Advocacy. In: Journal of Business and Technical Communication 27 (1), S. 62–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912448871

NABU (2016): Stunde der Wintervögel mit Rekordteilnahme. Online verfügbar unter https://www.nabu.de/tiere-und-pflanzen/aktionen-und-projekte/stunde-der-wintervoegel, zuletzt geprüft am 12. 06. 2017.

Nitti, Michele; Atzori, Luigi; Cvijikj, Irene P. (2015): Friendship Selection in the Social Internet of Things: Challenges and Possible Strategies. In: IEEE Internet of Things Journal 2 (3), S. 240–247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2014.2384734

Nitti, Michele; Girau, Roberto; Atzori, Luigi (2014): Trustworthiness Management in the Social Internet of Things. In: IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 26 (5), S. 1253–1266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2013.105

Nitti, Michele; Girau, Roberto; Atzori, Luigi; Iera, Antonio; Morabito, Giacomo (2012): A Subjective Model for Trustworthiness Evaluation in the Social Internet of Things. In: IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC). IEEE, S. 18–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/PIMRC.2012.6362662

Olson, Mancur (1965): The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge M. A.: Harvard University Press.

Ostrom, Elinor (1999): Die Verfassung der Allmende: Jenseits von Staat und Markt. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

Pacheco-Torgal, Fernando et al. (2016): Start-up Creation: The Smart Eco-efficient Built Environment. Duxford: Woodhead. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100546-0.00001-7

Quan, Zhou; Gui, Fu; Xiao, Deqin; Tang, Yi (2012): Trusted Architecture for Farmland Wireless Sensor Networks. In: IEEE 4th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom). IEEE, S. 782–787. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CloudCom.2012.6427496

Restuccia, Francesco; Das, Sajal K.; Payton, Jamie (2016): Incentive Mechanisms for Participatory Sensing: Survey and Research Challenges. In: ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 12 (2), 13, 40 S. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2888398

Ruiz-Mallén, Isabel et al. (2016): Citizen Science. In: Science Communication 38 (4), S. 523–534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547016642241

Scott, Dayna Nadine (2015): „We Are the Monitors Now.“ In: Social and Legal Studies 25 (3), S. 261–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663915601166

Swan, Melanie (2012): Sensor Mania! The Internet of Things, Wearable Computing, Objective Metrics, and the Quantified Self 2.0. In: Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks 1 (3), S. 217–253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan1030217

Ukil, Arijit; Sen, Jaydip; Koilakonda, Sripad (2011): Embedded Security for Internet of Things. In: 2nd National Conference on Emerging Trends and Applications in Computer Science (NCETACS). IEEE, S. 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/NCETACS.2011.5751382

Vayena, Effy; Tasioulas, John (2015): „We the Scientists“: a Human Right to Citizen Science. In: Philosophy and Technology 28 (3), S. 479–485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-015-0204-0

Vaz, Paulo; Bruno, Fernanda (2003): Types of Self-surveillance: From Abnormality to Individuals ‘at Risk’. In: Surveillance and Society 1 (3), S. 272–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v1i3.3341

Whitson, Jennifer R. (2013): Gaming the Quantified Self. In: Surveillance and Society 11 (1/2), S. 163–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v11i1/2.4454

Published

15.08.2017

How to Cite

1.
Weber K, Kleine N, Pallas F, Ulbricht M-R. Participatory sensing and wearable technologies as tools to support citizen and open science: Technical and organizational challenges and possible solutions. TATuP [Internet]. 2017 Aug. 15 [cited 2022 Oct. 4];26(1-2):25-30. Available from: https://www.tatup.de/index.php/tatup/article/view/22

Most read articles by the same author(s)