Responsibility versus sustainability, ethics, and societal engagement

The German Science, Technology, Innovation context

Authors

  • Miltos Ladikas Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) (Deutschland)
  • Julia Hahn Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) (Deutschland)
  • Leonhard Hennen Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) (Deutschland)
  • Constanze Scherz Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) (Deutschland)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.29.3.64

Keywords:

responsible research and innovation, ethics, engagement, science-technology-innovation, sustainability

Abstract

We examine the concept of responsible research and innovation (RRI) in Germany in the context of national science, technology and innovation (STI) as well as its legal and normative framework in relation to ethics and societal engagement and compare the results to similar international research. Our analysis shows that responsibility plays a central role in research practice guided by research ethics standards and societal grand challenges. Consequently, there is a significant increase in demands for inclusion and engagement of a wider stakeholder spectrum in STI. Compared to other countries, the concept of RRI in Germany is increasingly superseded by that of sustainability. We argue that responsibility and sustainability are conceptually close and highly interchangeable in the German national debate. We conclude with basic recommendations for greater clarity in research on responsibility and sustainability and the aims of ethics and societal engagement.

References

BMBF – Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (2014): Die neue Hightech-Strategie. Innovationen für Deutschland. Available online at https://www.bmbf.de/pub_hts/HTS_Broschure_Web.pdf, last accessed on 15. 05. 2020.

BMBF – Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (2016): Bundesbericht Forschung und Innovation 2016. Forschungs- und innovationspolitische Ziele und Maßnahmen. Available online at https://www.bundesbericht-forschung-innovation.de/files/Publikation-bmbf_bufi_2016_hauptband_barrierefrei.pdf, last accessed on 27. 10. 20.

Bogner, Alexander (ed.) (2013): Ethisierung der Technik – Technisierung der Ethik. Der Ethik-Boom im Lichte der Wissenschafts- und Technikforschung. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

DFG – Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (2019): Good research practice. Available online at https://www.dfg.de/en/research_funding/principles_dfg_funding/good_scientific_practice/, last accessed on 13. 05. 2020.

EC – European Commission (2020): Responsible research & innovation. Available online at https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation, last accessed on 28. 10. 2020.

Ethics Council (2020): The German ethics council. Available online at https://www.ethikrat.org/en/the-german-ethics-council/#m-tab-0-ourmandate, last accessed on 28. 10. 2020.

French National Assembly (2017): Resolution on science and progress in the French Republic. Available online at http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/14/ta/ta0926.asp, last accessed on 10. 05. 2020.

Hennen, Leonhard; Hahn, Julia; Ladikas, Miltos (in print): Competing modes of responsibility in research organisations. Insights from an international comparison. In: Science and Public Policy.

Ladikas, Miltos; Hahn, Julia; Hennen, Leonhard; Kulakov, Pavel; Scherz, Constanze (2019): Responsible research and innovation in Germany. Between sustainability and autonomy. In: Journal of Responsible Innovation, pp. 346–352.

LeNa project (2016): Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement in außeruniversitären Forschungsorganisationen. Available online at https://nachhaltig-forschen.de/startseite/, last accessed on 12. 05. 2020.

Norway Research Council (2015): Strategy for innovation in the public sector. Available online at: https://www.forskningsradet.no/siteassets/publikasjoner/strategy-for-innovation-in-the-public-sector.pdf, last accessed on 18. 05. 2020.

Quartier Zukunft et al. (ed.) (2020): Dein Quartier und Du. Nachhaltigkeitsexperimente im Reallabor zu Nachbarschaften, Bienen, Naschbeeten, Kreativität und Konsum. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing.

Schroeder, Doris; Rerimassie, Virgil (2015): Science and technology governance and European values. In: Miltos Ladikas, Sachin Chaturvedi, Yandong Zhao and Dirk Stemerding (eds.): Science and technology governance and ethics. A global perspective from Europe, India and China. Cham: Springer, pp. 53–71.

Stilgoe, Jack; Owen, Richard; Macnaghten, Phil (2013): Developing a framework for responsible innovation. In: Research Policy, 42 (9), pp. 1568–80.

Downloads

Published

15.12.2020

How to Cite

1.
Ladikas M, Hahn J, Hennen L, Scherz C. Responsibility versus sustainability, ethics, and societal engagement: The German Science, Technology, Innovation context. TATuP [Internet]. 2020 Dec. 15 [cited 2022 Aug. 19];29(3):64-9. Available from: https://www.tatup.de/index.php/tatup/article/view/6838

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>