Artificial intelligence in human genomics and biomedicine

Dynamics, potentials and challenges

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.30.3.30

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, genomics, biomedicine, knowledge, governance

Abstract

The increasing availability of extensive and complex data has made human genomics and its applications in (bio)medicine an at­ tractive domain for artificial intelligence (AI) in the form of advanced machine learning (ML) methods. These methods are linked not only to the hope of improving diagnosis and drug development. Rather, they may also advance key issues in biomedicine, e. g. understanding how individual differences in the human genome may cause specific traits or diseases. We analyze the increasing convergence of AI and genom­ics, the emergence of a corresponding innovation system, and how these associative AI methods relate to the need for causal knowledge in biomedical research and development (R&D) and in medical prac­tice. Finally, we look at the opportunities and challenges for clinical practice and the implications for governance issues arising from this convergence.

References

Böhme, Hartmut (2007): Kulturgeschichte der Technik. In: Hartmut Böhme, Peter Matussek and Lothar Müller (eds.): Orientierung Kulturwissenschaft. Was sie kann, was sie will. Hamburg: Rowohlt, pp. 164–179.

Bösl, Elsbeth (2017): Doing ancient DNA. Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte der aDNA-Forschung. Bielefeld: transcript.

Chiara, Matteo et al. (2021): Next generation sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Challenges, applications and opportunities. In: Briefings in Bioinformatics 22 (2), pp. 616–630.

Dewey-Hagborg, Heather (2017): Probably Chelsea. In: Heather Dewey-Hagborg and Chelsea Manning (eds.): A becoming resemblance. New York: Fridman Gallery, pp. 11–16. Available online at https://deweyhagborg.com/content/6-projects/11-probably-chelsea/a-becoming-resemblance_catalog_online.pdf, last accessed on 05. 05. 2021.

Edgerton, David (2006): The shock of the old. Technology and global history since 1900. London: Oxford University Press.

Frieman, Catherine; Hofmann, Daniela (2019): Present pasts in the archaeology of genetics, identity, and migration in Europe. A critical essay. In: World Archaeology 51 (4), pp. 528–545.

Furholt, Martin (2020): Biodeterminism and pseudo-objectivity as obstacles for the emerging field of archaeogenetics. In: Archaeological Dialogues 27 (1), pp. 23–25.

Hagner, Michael (2012): Wissenschaft und Demokratie oder: Wie demokratisch soll die Wissenschaft sein? In: Michael Hagner (ed.): Wissenschaft und Demokratie. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 9–50.

Jones, Elizabeth; Bösl, Elsbeth (2021): Ancient human DNA. A history hype (then and now). In: Journal of Social Archaeology 21 (2), pp. 236–255.

Källén, Anna; Mulcare, Charlotte; Nyblom, Andreas; Strand, Daniel (2019): Archaeogenetics in popular media. Contemporary implications of ancient DNA. In: Current Swedish Archaeology 27, pp. 69–91.

Maran, Joseph (in press): Archaeological cultures, fabricated ethnicities and DNA research. “Minoans” and “Mycenaeans” as case examples. In: Uri Davidovich, Sveta Matskevich and Naama Yahalom-Mack (eds.): Material, method, and meaning. Papers in Eastern Mediterranean archaeology in honor of Ilan Sharon. Münster: Zaphon.

McGonigle, Ian; Benjamin, Ruha (2016): The molecularization of identity. Science and subjectivity in the 21st century. In: Genetics Research 98, E12.

Meier, Mischa; Patzold, Steffen (2021): Gene und Geschichte. Was die Archäogenetik zur Geschichtsforschung beitragen kann. Stuttgart: Hiersemann.

Möser, Kurt (2010): Fortdauer und Wiederkehr des Alten in der Technik. In: Andreas Böhn and Kurt Möser (eds.): Techniknostalgie und Retrotechnologie. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing, pp. 17–40.

Nordmann, Alfred (2008): Technikphilosophie. Zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius.

Nye, David (2006): Technology matters. Questions to live with. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Reich, David (2018): Who we are and how we got here. Ancient DNA and the new science of the human past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Renn, Ortwin (2011): Neue Technologien, neue Technikfolgen. Ambivalenz, Komplexität und Unsicherheit als Herausforderung der Technikfolgenabschätzung. In: Christian Kehrt, Peter Schüssler and Marc-Denis Weitze (eds.): Neue Technologien in der Gesellschaft. Akteure, Erwartungen, Kontroversen und Konjunkturen. Bielefeld: transcript, pp. 63–76.

Robert Koch Institut (2021): Genomsequenzierung von SARS-CoV-2-positiven Proben bei Verdacht auf das Vorliegen einer Variant of Concern (VOC). Infobrief (22 January 2021, updated 19 April 2021) für Gesundheitsämter. Available online at https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/DESH/CorSurV_Brief_Gesundheitsamt.pdf?__blob=publicationFile, last accessed on 02. 05. 2021.

Samida, Stefanie (2020): Über mediale Präsenz und Prominenz DNA-gestützter Vergangenheitsforschung. In: NTM: Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 28 (2), pp. 181–192.

Samida, Stefanie (2021): Molekularbiologie und Archäologie. Eine ungewöhnliche Beziehung. Wien: Turia + Kant.

Schrock, Roddy (2017): Release and becoming. In: Heather Dewey-Hagborg and Chelsea Manning (eds.): A becoming resemblance. New York: Fridman Gallery, pp. 5–7. Available online at https://deweyhagborg.com/content/6-projects/11-probably-chelsea/a-becoming-resemblance_catalog_online.pdf, last accessed on 05. 05. 2021.

Sommer, Marianne; Krüger, Gesine (eds.) (2011): Biohistorische Anthropologie. Knochen, Körper und DNA in Erinnerungskulturen. Berlin: Kadmos.

Strand, Daniel; Källén, Anna (2021): I am a Viking! DNA, popular culture and the construction of geneticized identity. In: New Genetics and Society.

Downloads

Published

20.12.2021

How to Cite

1.
Heil R, Heyen NB, Baumann M, Hüsing B, Bachlechner D, Schmoch U, König H. Artificial intelligence in human genomics and biomedicine: Dynamics, potentials and challenges. TATuP [Internet]. 2021 Dec. 20 [cited 2022 Aug. 19];30(3):30-6. Available from: https://www.tatup.de/index.php/tatup/article/view/6928

Funding data

Most read articles by the same author(s)