Post-normal crises and technology assessment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.32.2.11

Keywords:

technology assessment, crises, science advice, science communication, public engagement

Abstract

Reflections on the challenges for science in crises have become an integral part of public policy and technology assessment (TA). The urgency and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic brought up the question of how scientific disciplines and individual scientists can provide appropriate advice to decision makers and the public while maintaining transparency and independence. Because of the speed with which solutions had to be found, the range of questions narrowed and some topics were given priority over others. In many countries, decisions were made without broader public participation and without involving the wide variety of stakeholders. In the light of the waning COVID-19 pandemic and the surging climate crisis, it is time to consider how TA, its organizations, and networks can reasonably position themselves to achieve their goals under these conditions. This introduction presents the Special topic of this TATuP issue, in which four research articles explore the role of TA in crises from different perspectives.

References

Allhutter, Doris et al. (2022): Sichere Stromversorgung und Blackout-Vorsorge in Österreich. Entwicklungen, Risiken und mögliche Schutzmaßnahmen. Wien: ITA. Available online at https://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-projektberichte/ITA-AIT-17.pdf, last accessed on 16. 05. 2023.

Baldwin, Richard; Weder di Mauro, Beatrice (2020): Mitigating the COVID economic crisis. Act fast and do whatever it takes. London: CEPR Press. Available online at https://cepr.org/system/files/publication-files/60118-mitigating_the_covid_economic_crisis_act_fast_and_do_whatever_it_takes.pdf, last accessed on 16. 05. 2023.

Bauer, Anja; Kastenhofer, Karen (2019): Policy advice in technology assessment. Shifting roles, principles and boundaries. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change 139, pp. 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.023

Bogner, Alexander; Buntfuß, Paul; Fuchs, Daniela; Sinozic-Martinez, Tanja (in print): Wissenschaftliche Politikberatung in Krisenzeiten. Eine vergleichende Analyse ihrer Prozesse, Praktiken und Probleme mit Blick auf Österreich, Deutschland und Großbritannien. Wien: ITA.

Boin, Arjen; Lodge, Martin; Luesink, Marte (2020): Learning from the COVID-19 crisis. An initial analysis of national responses. In: Policy Design and Practice 3 (3), pp. 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1823670 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1823670

Brem, Alexander; Viardot, Eric; Nylund, Petra (2021): Implications of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak for innovation. Which technologies will improve our lives? In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change 163, p. 120451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120451

Cairney, Paul (2020): The UK government’s COVID-19 policy. Assessing evidence-informed policy analysis in real time. In: British Politics 16, pp. 90–116. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-020-00150-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-020-00150-8

Cairney, Paul; Wellstead, Adam (2021): COVID-19. Effective policymaking depends on trust in experts, politicians, and the public. In: Policy Design and Practice 4 (1), pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1837466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1837466

Calvert, Jonathan; Arbuthnott, George (2021): Failures of state. The inside story of Britain’s battle with Coronavirus. New York: HarperCollins.

de Vries, Annick; van Waes, Arnoud; van Est, Rinie; van der Meulen, Barend; Brom, Frans (2015): Enabling participation. A vision on public participation in decision-making about long term radioactive waste management. The Hague: Rathenau Instituut. Available online at https://www.rathenau.nl/sites/default/files/2018-04/Enabling%20participation%20-%20Rathenau%20Instituut.pdf, last accessed on 16. 05. 2023.

Douglas, Margaret; Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal; Taulbut, Martin; McKee, Martin; McCartney, Gerry (2020): Mitigating the wider health effects of covid-19 pandemic response. In: BMJ 369, p. m1557. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1557 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1557

Drury, John; Reicher, Stephen; Stott, Clifford (2020): COVID-19 in context. Why do people die in emergencies? It’s probably not because of collective psychology. In: British Journal of Social Psychology 59 (3), pp. 686–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12393 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12393

Farrar, Jeremy; Ahuja, Anjana (2021): Spike. The virus vs. the people – the inside story. London: Profile Books.

Frischmann, Brett; Selinger, Evan (2018): Re-engineering humanity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316544846 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316544846

Funtowicz, Silvio; Ravetz, Jerome (1993): Science for the post-normal age. In: Futures 25 (7), pp. 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L

Greenhalgh, Trisha (2020): Will COVID-19 be evidence-based medicine’s nemesis? In: PLoS Med 17 (6), p. e1003266. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003266

Grunwald, Armin (2016): Nachhaltigkeit verstehen. Arbeiten an der Bedeutung nachhaltiger Entwicklung. München: oekom verlag.

Grunwald, Armin (2017): Technology assessment and policy advice in the field of sustainable development. In: Lech Zacher (ed.): Technology, society and sustainability. Cham: Springer, pp. 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47164-8_14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47164-8_14

Grunwald, Armin (2018): Diverging pathways to overcoming the environmental crisis. A critique of eco-modernism from a technology assessment perspective. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 197 (2), pp. 1854–1862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.212 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.212

Hahn, Julia et al. (2020): Technology assessment for a changing world. In: TATuP – Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice 29 (3), pp. 74–75. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.29.3.74

Hilgartner, Stephen (2000): Science on stage. Expert advice as public drama. Stanford: Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503618220 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503618220

Hilgartner, Stephen; Hurlbut, Benjamin; Jasanoff, Sheila (2021): Was “science” on the ballot? Labelling dissent as “anti-science” is bad social science and bad politics. In: Science 371 (6532), pp. 893–894. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf8762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf8762

Jasanoff, Sheila (1990): The fifth branch. Science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Jasanoff, Sheila (1997): Civilization and madness. The great BSE scare of 1996. In: Public Understanding of Science 6 (3), pp. 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/6/3/002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/6/3/002

Jasanoff, Sheila; Hilgartner, Stephen; Hurlbut, Benjamin; Özgöde, Onur; Rayzberg, Margarita (2021): Comparative Covid response. Crisis, knowledge, politics. Interim report. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School. Available online at https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/comparative-covid-response-crisis-knowledge-politics#citation, last accessed on 16. 05. 2023.

Kontoangelos, Konstantinos; Economou, Marina; Papageorgiou, Charalambos (2020): Mental health effects of COVID-19 Pandemia. A Review of clinical and psychological traits. In: Psychiatry Investigation 17 (6), pp. 491–505. https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2020.0161 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2020.0161

Krastev, Ivan (2020): Is it tomorrow, yet? Paradoxes of the pandemic. London: Penguin Books.

McKee, Martin et al. (2022): Open science communication. The first year of the UK’s independent scientific advisory group for emergencies. In: Health Policy 126 (3), pp. 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.01.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.01.006

Mena, Carlos; Karatzas, Antonios; Hansen, Carsten (2022): International trade resilience and the Covid-19 pandemic. In: Journal of Business Research 138, pp. 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.064

Morgan, Marcus (2020): Why meaning-making matters. The case of the UK Government’s COVID-19 response. In: American Journal of Cultural Sociology 8, pp. 270–323. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-020-00121-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-020-00121-y

Ornetzeder, Michael; Rohracher, Harald (2013): Of solar collectors, wind power, and car sharing. Comparing and understanding successful cases of grassroots innovations. In Global Environmental Change 23 (5), pp. 856–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.007

Ornetzeder, Michael; Wicher, Magdalena; Suschek-Berger, Jürgen (2016): User satisfaction and well-being in energy efficient office buildings. Evidence from cutting-edge projects in Austria. In: Energy and Buildings 118, pp. 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.02.036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.02.036

Ornetzeder, Michael et al. (2018): Determining factors for integrated smart grid solutions. Deliverable 3.1. Alborg: Alborg University. Available online at https://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/determining-factors-for-integrated-smart-energy-solutions-deliver, last accessed on 16. 05. 2023.

Pielke Jr., Roger (2007): The honest broker. Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818110

Plohl, Nejc; Musil, Bojan (2021): Modelling compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines. The critical role of trust in science. In: Psychology, Health and Medicine 26 (1), pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2020.1772988 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2020.1772988

Rutter, Harry; Wolpert, Miranda; Greenhalgh, Trisha (2020): Managing uncertainty in the covid-19 era. In: BMJ 370, p. m3349. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3349

Sampat, Bhaven; Shadlen, Kenneth (2021): The COVID-19 innovation system. In: Health Affairs 40 (3), pp. 400–409. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.02097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.02097

Sasse, Tom; Haddon, Catherine; Nice, Alex (2020): Science advice in a crisis. London: Institute for Government. Available online at https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/science-advice-crisis_0.pdf, last accessed on 16. 05. 2023.

Scally, Gabriel; Jacobson, Bobbie; Abbasi, Kamran (2020): The UK’s public health response to covid-19. In: BMJ 369, p. m1932. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1932 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1932

Smallman, Melanie (2020): ’Independent Sage’ group is an oxymoron. In: Research Professional News, Political science blog, 05. 05. 2020. Available online at https://www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-political-science-blog-2020-5-independent-sage-group-is-an-oxymoron, last accessed on 16. 05. 2023

Smits, Ruud; van Merkerk, Rutger; Guston, David; Sarewitz, Daniel (2010): The role of technology assessment in systemic innovation policy. In: Ruud Smits, Stefan Kuhlmann and Phillip Shapira (eds.): The theory and practice of innovation policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849804424.00025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849804424.00025

Sotoudeh, Mahshid (2005): Links between sustainability and technology development. In: IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 24 (1), pp. 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTAS.2005.1407742 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MTAS.2005.1407742

Spinney, Laura (2017) Pale rider. The Spanish Flu of 1918 and how it changed the world. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.

Strauss, Stefan (2019): Privacy and identity in a networked society. Refining privacy impact assessment. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429451355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429451355

TAB – Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag (2022): Energy consumption of ICT infrastructure. Berlin: TAB. https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000152733

Tan, Chianru et al. (2021): Applications of digital PCR in COVID-19 pandemic. In: VIEW 2 (2), p. 20200082. https://doi.org/10.1002/VIW.20200082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/VIW.20200082

Truffer, Bernhard; Schippl, Jens; Fleischer, Torsten (2017): Decentering technology in technology assessment. Prospects for socio-technical transitions in electric mobility in Germany. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change 122, pp. 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.020

van den Broek-Honingh, Nelleke; Glas, Iris; Vennekens, Alexandra (2021): Trust in science in the Netherlands (2021 survey). The Hague: Rathenau Instituut. Available online at https://www.rathenau.nl/sites/default/files/2021-12/REPORT_Trust_in_science_in_the_Netherlands_2021_survey_Rathenau_Instituut.pdf, last accessed on 16. 05. 2023.

Weber, Max (1919): Politik als Beruf. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

Wu, Jun; Wang, Jian; Nicholas, Stephen; Maitland, Elizabeth; Fan, Qiuyan (2020): Application of big data technology for COVID-19 prevention and control in China. Lessons and recommendations. In: Journal of Medical Internet Research 22 (10), p. e21980. https://doi.org/10.2196/21980 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/21980

Downloads

Published

06.07.2023

How to Cite

1.
Sinozic-Martinez T, Weinberger N, Hahn J. Post-normal crises and technology assessment. TATuP [Internet]. 2023 Jul. 6 [cited 2024 Apr. 16];32(2):11-6. Available from: https://www.tatup.de/index.php/tatup/article/view/7059

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>